Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

53580

in Rewey, WisconsinPopulation 442

51.60/ 100

Ranked #13,990 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #493 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #55 of 67 Madison, WI ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transportation noise

0.00%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.2 pCi/L

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.8%

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.5%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

23.6%

in the top 12.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

79.9%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US20th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Rewey, Wisconsin (ZIP 53580) comes out in the top 44% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,990th) and the bottom 35% of Wisconsin (493rd).

continue reading

Several good marks anchor the profile and deserve first mention: modeled transportation noise is in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and pfas resides in the bottom 6.4% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise rests at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk lies in the bottom 12.2% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. By contrast, modeled radon settles in the top 8.2% nationally, and binge drinking registers in the top 8.3% nationally. Poverty stands in the top 12.5% nationally, and distance to a community health center lands in the top 16% nationally. Home broadband subscription is in the bottom 17% nationally.

In plain terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 53565, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Madison, WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.4%24.2–30.6
High blood pressure among adults32.2%28.3–36.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.8–9.5
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%5.9–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.0–8.1
Depression among adults25.2%21.7–28.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.0%9.4–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.6%30.6–38.6
Obesity among adults40.1%32.9–47.6
Stroke among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.9%8.7–13.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%5.9–9.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%74.4–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.0%72.3–79.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.6–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.0%62.9–72.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.5%60.7–68.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.3%68.4–82.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.5%16.3–23.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.1–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.9%24.9–34.7
Short sleep duration among adults34.7%28.3–41.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.4%15.5–21.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%14.8–18.8
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%12.0–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%11.9–15.6
Any disability among adults30.4%26.0–34.5
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.2–9.5
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.4–15.5
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.4%3.8–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.9%16.7–23.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.9%9.6–14.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.4–15.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%7.9–11.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.7–7.8
Loneliness among adults30.6%25.8–35.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.7–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–6414.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)7.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)4.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle6.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription79.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate72.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households56.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+11.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age32.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$61,667$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$145,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$850$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 1.3478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.34 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured