ZIP code
53571
in Morrisonville, WisconsinPopulation 367
60.30/ 100
Ranked #4,639 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.5%)
Ranked #90 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 11.8%)
Ranked #25 of 67 Madison, WI ZIPs (top 37%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS2ndDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
20.5%
in the top 4.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST85thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
42.9%
in the bottom 6.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST2ndUS6thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
4.4%
in the bottom 6.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST20thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
74.4%
in the top 4.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST93rdUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
29.1%
in the bottom 6.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST8thUS6thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
42.9%
in the top 7.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
28.2%
in the bottom 8.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST17thUS8thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
5.1%
in the bottom 8.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST13thUS9thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›The read
Morrisonville, Wisconsin (ZIP 53571), by its composite score, sits in the top 14.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,639th) and the top 11.8% of Wisconsin (90th).
The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled disaster risk lands in the bottom 1.8% nationally, and home broadband subscription stands at the national maximum. Modeled utility shutoff registers in the bottom 6.6% nationally, and colon screening settles in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled short sleep sits in the bottom 6.2% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle rests at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled binge drinking resides in the top 4.5% nationally, homeownership is in the bottom 6.0% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the top 7.2% nationally.
Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 53532, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Madison, WI metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 79%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 84%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 79%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 82%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 64%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 63%
8%
Disability
healthier than 83%
7%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 55%
5%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 19%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 87%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 83%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 85%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 68%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 83%
11%
Disability
healthier than 86%
7%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 57%
8%
Holding it back
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 21%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 19%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 62%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 95%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 73%
13%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 50%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 55%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 53%
8%
Disability
healthier than 55%
7%
Holding it back
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 26%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 26%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
53532
Wisconsinshares a border
Score 62.91
Closest healthier
53911
Wisconsinshares a border
Score 62.05
Similar health profile
53517
Wisconsin98% similar profile
Score 62.61
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 24.3% | 21.4–27.3 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 30.9% | 27.4–34.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.8% | 7.8–9.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.0% | 8.7–11.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 6.1% | 5.1–7.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 5.9% | 4.4–7.5 |
| Depression among adults | 24.4% | 21.4–27.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 10.0% | 8.3–11.9 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 33.6% | 30.3–36.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 36.0% | 31.5–40.9 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.1% | 2.5–3.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 11.0% | 9.0–13.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.1% | 4.3–8.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 77.0% | 73.3–80.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 75.2% | 72.1–78.4 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 88.3% | 86.1–90.3 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 74.4% | 70.9–77.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 70.2% | 67.5–72.8 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 79.6% | 74.2–84.4 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 20.5% | 17.8–23.6 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 13.3% | 9.7–17.3 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 22.5% | 17.8–27.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 29.1% | 25.7–32.6 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 15.3% | 11.9–19.1 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 14.4% | 12.2–16.6 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.6% | 10.3–15.0 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 11.3% | 9.1–13.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 26.2% | 21.7–30.8 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 6.4% | 5.4–7.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 6.7% | 5.3–8.3 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 11.8% | 9.2–14.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.3% | 2.5–4.1 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.7% | 2.9–4.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 18.3% | 15.1–21.9 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.7% | 6.2–11.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 9.0% | 6.3–12.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 7.7% | 5.8–9.9 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 5.1% | 4.0–6.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 28.2% | 24.4–32.3 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.4% | 3.4–5.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 5.2% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 8.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 5.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 26.2% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 23.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 42.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764 |
| Homeownership rate | 42.9% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 81.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768 |
| Single-parent households | 20.2% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 59.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762 |
| Population 65+ | 13.1% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768 |
| Median age | 40.9 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 44.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765 |
| Median household income | $65,729 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755 |
| Median home value | $197,800 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $914 ($696–$1,261) n=706 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | WI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 84.5 yr ± 2.28 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.28 years of 84.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured