Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

53536

in Evansville, WisconsinPopulation 9,547

57.70/ 100

Ranked #6,645 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #171 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #1 of 12 Janesville-Beloit, WI ZIPs (top 8.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Child-care access

0.55 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.7%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

30.5%

in the bottom 12.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Evansville, Wisconsin (ZIP 53536), on the composite measure, lands in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,645th) and the top 22% of Wisconsin (171st).

continue reading

Where this area does well, the measures make it plain: childcare sits in the top 8.7% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff registers in the bottom 9.7% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled high cholesterol resides in the bottom 10.2% nationally, and high blood pressure lies in the bottom 12.8% nationally. Modeled transportation settles in the bottom 17% nationally, and stroke stands in the bottom 15.0% nationally. Against that, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking rests in the top 14.1% nationally, and distance to a community health center sits in the top 16% nationally.

In everyday language, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 53521, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Janesville-Beloit, WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the top 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.2%22.6–28.3
High blood pressure among adults30.5%27.2–34.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.5–9.2
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%5.0–6.5
Depression among adults23.7%20.6–27.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.4%9.1–11.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.2%29.8–37.1
Obesity among adults40.2%34.6–46.6
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.8%7.1–10.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.7–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.7%72.6–78.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.4%73.0–79.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.8–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.4%64.3–72.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.0%67.1–73.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%69.6–81.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.6%15.6–22.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.4%11.4–15.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.5%21.9–29.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.1%30.4–40.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.3%14.2–18.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%13.7–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%11.0–14.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%10.6–13.7
Any disability among adults27.4%23.9–31.2
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.5–7.0
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.2–8.0
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.2–13.5
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.2%17.3–23.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.1–11.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.4–11.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.1–9.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.9–6.5
Loneliness among adults30.2%26.1–34.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.1–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–642.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)3.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)34.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle3.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription91.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate77.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households56.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+15.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age38.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$87,667$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$304,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$1,081$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.4 yr ± 0.9478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.94 years of 81.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured