Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

53040

in Kewaskum, WisconsinPopulation 8,630

57.57/ 100

Ranked #6,746 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #176 of 763 Wisconsin ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #49 of 80 Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

20.5%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST79th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.7%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

2.2%

in the top 14.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Kewaskum, Wisconsin (ZIP 53040) sits in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,746th) and the top 23% of Wisconsin (176th).

continue reading

A healthy showing across the board, and a few measures carry it: modeled mammography sits in the top 6.7% nationally, modeled utility shutoff stands in the bottom 9.7% nationally, and elder services resides in the top 12.8% nationally. Modeled loneliness sits in the bottom 16% nationally, grocery stands in the top 16% nationally, and modeled transportation resides in the bottom 17% nationally. Modeled tooth loss sits in the bottom 14.6% nationally, and food insecurity stands in the bottom 18% nationally. On the other hand, modeled binge drinking resides in the top 4.5% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 14.1% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 53075, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.1%24.5–29.8
High blood pressure among adults33.6%30.4–36.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.6–10.3
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.7–7.4
Depression among adults23.3%20.5–26.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.5–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.9%32.7–39.3
Obesity among adults38.2%33.0–43.4
Stroke among adults3.4%3.0–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.3%6.7–9.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.5–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%76.2–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%75.7–81.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%86.0–89.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%66.4–74.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.3%68.4–73.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.0%75.4–85.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.5%17.6–23.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.8%11.7–15.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.5%21.0–28.1
Short sleep duration among adults33.5%28.8–38.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.5%14.3–18.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.9–17.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.5–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%10.9–13.8
Any disability among adults27.8%24.6–31.1
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.4–8.0
Independent living disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Mobility disability among adults12.9%11.2–14.7
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.5%17.0–22.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.2–11.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.3–11.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.0–9.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.9–6.4
Loneliness among adults29.2%25.8–32.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (3.6–16.0%) n=765
Uninsured 18–643.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.7% (2.4–14.9%) n=764
No HS diploma (25+)5.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.9% (2.3–12.6%) n=768
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50523.5% (12.7–44.0%) n=768
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.6% (0.9–5.6%) n=763
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.8–9.0%) n=764
Broadband subscription88.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (80.0–94.8%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.8% (14.7–29.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate84.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.3% (62.1–91.8%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.7%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.3–6.8%) n=768
Single-parent households60.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08759.0% (47.7–72.8%) n=762
Population 65+19.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (13.9–32.2%) n=768
Median age39.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29244.2 yr (36.2–56.1) n=765
Median household income$96,096$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,147 ($57,542–$101,625) n=755
Median home value$326,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$231,900 ($160,140–$367,300) n=755
Median gross rent$1,092$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$914 ($696–$1,261) n=706
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.4 yr ± 0.8378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.4 yr (77.7–83.6) n=712

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.83 years of 80.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured