Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52768

in Princeton, IowaPopulation 1,352

54.34/ 100

Ranked #10,261 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #310 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #23 of 63 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

21.3%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

82.7%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.72 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

10.7%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.9%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

32.9%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

2.5%

in the top 12.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$112,563

in the top 12.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Princeton, Iowa (ZIP 52768) stands in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,261st) and the top 34% of Iowa (310th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: fatal road crashes lies at the national minimum, and civic is in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled mammography registers in the top 2.8% nationally, and childcare lies in the top 4.9% nationally. By contrast, modeled binge drinking is in the top 2.7% nationally, transportation noise registers in the top 7.7% nationally, and loud transportation noise lies in the top 8.1% nationally. Floodplain exposure is in the top 8.8% nationally, modeled radon registers in the top 13.3% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure lies in the top 12.8% nationally.

For clarity, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 52748, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.9%28.9–34.8
High blood pressure among adults34.8%31.5–38.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.1–11.0
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.4–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.2–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.1–8.3
Depression among adults20.7%18.2–23.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.5%9.9–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.5%34.2–41.0
Obesity among adults40.4%35.7–45.3
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.6%8.6–13.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.3–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%77.6–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.9–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.7–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.8%67.7–75.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.7%67.6–73.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years82.7%77.5–87.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.3%18.5–24.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.4%11.9–17.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.1%19.5–26.8
Short sleep duration among adults33.5%29.1–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.1%14.5–19.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%13.9–17.7
Frequent physical distress among adults13.1%11.4–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%10.5–13.8
Any disability among adults25.9%22.5–29.3
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.9–8.7
Independent living disability among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Mobility disability among adults12.6%10.7–14.5
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.8–3.7
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.1%19.1–25.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.2–12.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.7–10.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.9–9.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.8–6.6
Loneliness among adults31.8%28.0–35.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.7–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–642.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)2.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription88.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate90.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households63.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+22.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age50.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$112,563$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$291,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$600$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.1 yr ± 1.6378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.63 years of 82.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured