Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52727

in Bryant, IowaPopulation 398

50.52/ 100

Ranked #15,523 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #620 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

7.7%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.4%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

1.3%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$103,188

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Bryant, Iowa (ZIP 52727), overall, ranks in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,523rd) and the bottom 33% of Iowa (620th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, this area's strong points come through first: home broadband subscription lies at the national maximum, modeled pfas stands in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and poverty rests in the bottom 5.6% nationally. Unemployment registers at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle resides at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Homeownership is in the top 12.6% nationally. Crowded housing sits at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled binge drinking lands in the top 4.8% nationally, and walkability lies in the bottom 7.2% nationally.

Defined simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 52750, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.9%29.1–36.8
High blood pressure among adults40.1%35.7–44.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.2–11.4
Current asthma among adults10.2%8.9–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.1–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.3–10.7
Depression among adults20.2%17.0–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.2%11.1–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%34.9–43.9
Obesity among adults39.7%32.6–46.7
Stroke among adults4.1%3.5–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.1%10.4–16.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%4.6–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%77.3–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.5%74.7–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%83.5–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.5%59.2–69.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.4%61.8–68.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.2%72.0–85.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.4%17.0–24.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.2%13.5–20.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.3%22.2–32.8
Short sleep duration among adults32.9%27.2–39.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.6%16.0–23.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.1–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%12.5–17.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.0%11.9–16.4
Any disability among adults30.7%25.8–35.7
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.8–10.2
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.0–9.8
Mobility disability among adults15.7%13.1–18.7
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.4–4.9
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.1–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%18.9–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%8.9–14.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.2%7.8–12.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%6.8–10.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.5–7.9
Loneliness among adults31.2%26.2–36.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.2–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)1.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate92.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households83.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+14.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age37.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$103,188$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$258,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth85.3 yr ± 2.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.62 years of 85.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured