Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52640

in Morning Sun, IowaPopulation 1,274

53.23/ 100

Ranked #11,740 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranked #392 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

7.1%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST31st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.75 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

96.5%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST74th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.3%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST39th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Morning Sun, Iowa (ZIP 52640) stands in the top 37% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,740th) and the top 43% of Iowa (392nd).

continue reading

The strongest marks in the data are worth naming first: modeled pfas is in the bottom 3.5% nationally, and civic registers in the top 6.9% nationally. Fiber broadband lies in the top 8.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise registers in the bottom 12.9% nationally, housing-cost burden lies in the bottom 13.2% nationally, and unemployment is in the bottom 15% nationally. Recreation registers in the top 15% nationally. On the other side, modeled radon lies in the top 9.0% nationally, and binge drinking is in the top 9.3% nationally.

For clarity, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 52637, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.0%26.9–33.1
High blood pressure among adults35.6%31.9–39.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.0–10.8
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%7.0–9.1
Depression among adults21.2%18.2–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.3–13.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%32.9–40.8
Obesity among adults38.6%31.4–45.9
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.5%10.2–15.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%6.3–9.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%77.2–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.5%75.1–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults84.8%82.8–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.2%63.8–72.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.7%63.5–69.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.1%72.8–84.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.3%16.3–22.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.9%13.6–18.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.4%23.3–31.7
Short sleep duration among adults31.9%26.5–37.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.2%16.7–22.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.7–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.1–15.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.2%12.5–16.0
Any disability among adults30.5%26.7–34.6
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.6–9.4
Independent living disability among adults7.9%7.0–9.0
Mobility disability among adults14.4%12.5–16.5
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%20.5–27.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%9.7–13.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.8–11.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.6–10.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.7–7.5
Loneliness among adults32.1%27.5–36.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.1–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–645.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)10.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle1.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription89.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate86.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population2.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households62.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+25.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age46.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$67,813$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$125,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$806$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 0.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.89 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured