Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52362

in Wyoming, IowaPopulation 816

50.08/ 100

Ranked #16,124 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 50%)

Ranked #653 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #42 of 46 Cedar Rapids, IA ZIPs (bottom 8.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

6.0%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

27 mi

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.2 pCi/L

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST37th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.1%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.13%

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

29.1%

in the bottom 14.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Wyoming, Iowa (ZIP 52362) comes out in the bottom 50% nationally (16,124th) and the bottom 29% of Iowa (653rd).

continue reading

The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: modeled energy burden sits in the top 3.0% nationally, distance to a community health center settles in the top 5.0% nationally, and modeled radon registers in the top 7.7% nationally. Modeled binge drinking stands in the top 5.8% nationally. More encouragingly, elder services lands in the top 0.6% nationally, and fiber broadband is at the national maximum. Childcare resides in the top 1.8% nationally, and recreation rests in the top 7.4% nationally. Modeled transportation noise lies in the bottom 8.9% nationally, and pfas sits in the bottom 10.5% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 52212, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cedar Rapids, IA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.2%26.6–33.7
High blood pressure among adults37.2%33.0–41.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Current asthma among adults10.2%8.9–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.1–9.5
Depression among adults20.7%17.4–24.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.4%10.7–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.4%33.0–41.8
Obesity among adults40.8%32.7–48.7
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.5%8.4–12.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.3%5.0–7.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%76.6–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%75.9–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%83.8–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.9%63.1–72.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.6%61.0–68.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.3%67.8–82.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.1%16.7–23.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.9%14.2–19.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.0%21.6–31.0
Short sleep duration among adults35.2%29.1–42.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.7%16.0–21.7
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.4–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.2–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.6%11.8–15.5
Any disability among adults29.5%25.4–34.1
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.7
Independent living disability among adults7.9%6.9–9.0
Mobility disability among adults14.5%12.4–16.8
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%18.9–25.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.4–13.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.3–12.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.4–10.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.6–7.5
Loneliness among adults29.1%24.4–34.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.5–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–646.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)5.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription88.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate90.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households65.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+25.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age47.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$72,583$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$135,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$930$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.4 yr ± 2.0878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.08 years of 79.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured