Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52352

in Walker, IowaPopulation 1,833

57.36/ 100

Ranked #6,929 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #126 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 13.7%)

Ranked #18 of 46 Cedar Rapids, IA ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

20.6%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.2%

in the bottom 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

77.4%

in the bottom 12.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

8 mi

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.4%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Walker, Iowa (ZIP 52352) ranks in the top 22% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,929th) and the top 13.7% of Iowa (126th).

continue reading

Taken together, the profile's clearest strengths surface right away: modeled housing insecurity resides in the bottom 8.8% nationally, and transportation lands in the bottom 11.1% nationally. Modeled food insecurity registers in the bottom 13.5% nationally, and mammography sits in the top 11.1% nationally. Housing-cost burden rests in the bottom 14.5% nationally, and modeled utility shutoff is in the bottom 14.9% nationally. Against that, modeled binge drinking stands in the top 4.2% nationally, home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 12.8% nationally, and modeled radon lies in the top 15% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

In plainer terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 52213, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cedar Rapids, IA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.0%26.8–31.2
High blood pressure among adults33.9%31.4–36.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.4–10.9
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.2–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Depression among adults21.9%19.6–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%10.1–12.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.5%33.8–39.1
Obesity among adults35.6%32.0–39.3
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.4%8.8–12.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.4%4.5–6.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%77.6–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%76.7–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%85.4–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.7%67.3–73.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.1%67.5–72.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.0%75.1–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.6%18.5–22.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.9%12.0–15.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.2%19.6–25.1
Short sleep duration among adults31.6%28.2–35.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.8%14.0–17.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.7–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%11.2–13.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.3%10.9–13.7
Any disability among adults27.5%24.7–30.3
Hearing disability among adults7.8%7.1–8.6
Independent living disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.4
Mobility disability among adults12.3%10.9–13.8
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.3–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.1%20.6–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.7–10.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.9–8.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.2–8.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Loneliness among adults31.2%28.1–34.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–646.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)5.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle1.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription77.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate85.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households59.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+19.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age40.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$92,321$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$231,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$864$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.4 yr ± 1.2378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.23 years of 82.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured