Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52053

in Holy Cross, IowaPopulation 1,148

54.86/ 100

Ranked #9,608 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #273 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #11 of 15 Dubuque, IA ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

21.6%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

6.6%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.4 pCi/L

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST46th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.5 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

1.7%

in the bottom 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

34.8 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

7.2 mi

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US80th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

34.6%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

3.0%

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US25th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Holy Cross, Iowa (ZIP 52053), in overall standing, comes out in the top 30% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,608th) and the top 30% of Iowa (273rd).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled pfas settles in the bottom 2.9% nationally, poverty lands in the bottom 6.4% nationally, and modeled mammography rests in the top 16% nationally. On the other hand, modeled binge drinking settles in the top 2.3% nationally, modeled radon lands in the top 6.1% nationally, and walkability rests in the bottom 4.5% nationally. Fatal road crashes settles in the top 9.7% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center rests in the top 16% nationally. Recreation settles at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

Defined simply, for reference, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 52039, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Dubuque, IA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.2%25.5–30.9
High blood pressure among adults33.0%29.8–36.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.4–10.0
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.5%6.7–8.4
Depression among adults19.9%17.3–22.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.0%9.6–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.6%31.3–37.9
Obesity among adults36.1%30.7–41.6
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.2%7.6–11.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.4–7.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.6%76.1–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.6%74.5–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults84.3%82.5–86.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.8%60.6–68.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.3%64.4–70.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.2%73.6–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.6%18.6–24.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.9%13.7–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.5%21.2–28.0
Short sleep duration among adults32.9%28.4–37.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.6%15.5–19.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.7–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.9%11.5–14.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.7%12.2–15.3
Any disability among adults28.5%25.2–31.8
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.1–8.8
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.4
Mobility disability among adults13.1%11.4–14.7
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.4%19.5–25.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.5–12.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.8–10.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.2–9.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.5–7.1
Loneliness among adults30.9%27.1–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–646.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)8.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle2.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription88.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate78.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households59.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+25.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age48.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$83,000$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$251,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$682$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.5 yr ± 1.0078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.00 years of 82.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured