Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51559

in Neola, IowaPopulation 1,841

54.81/ 100

Ranked #9,684 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #277 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #79 of 113 Omaha, NE-IA ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4.2 pCi/L

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

21.7%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.41%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.6%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

10.7%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.3%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

7.5 mi

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

22 days/year

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US79th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Neola, Iowa (ZIP 51559), in overall standing, comes out in the top 30% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,684th) and the top 30% of Iowa (277th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: recreation sits in the top 8.0% nationally, modeled pfas stands in the bottom 8.1% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity resides in the bottom 12.3% nationally. Modeled transportation sits in the bottom 12.4% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled radon stands in the top 1.4% nationally, and binge drinking resides in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled nitrate sits in the top 7.5% nationally, and unemployment stands in the top 8.3% nationally. Modeled fine-particle resides in the top 14.9% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Defined simply, for reference, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 51542, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Omaha, NE-IA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.0%24.4–29.7
High blood pressure among adults33.7%30.5–36.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.4
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.2–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.5–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.7–7.3
Depression among adults21.7%18.9–24.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%8.9–11.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.7%33.4–39.9
Obesity among adults37.0%32.2–41.8
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.1%8.3–12.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.3%4.4–6.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.6–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.1%75.1–80.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.6%85.0–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.2%65.3–72.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.2%66.2–72.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.7%72.8–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.7%18.7–24.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.7%12.6–17.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.8%19.7–26.3
Short sleep duration among adults33.1%28.6–37.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.3%13.4–17.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.0%14.3–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.8–13.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%11.0–14.0
Any disability among adults27.2%24.0–30.5
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.3–7.8
Independent living disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Mobility disability among adults12.0%10.5–13.6
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%20.3–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.9–11.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.0–8.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.5–8.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.8–6.1
Loneliness among adults32.9%29.0–36.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.5–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–645.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)2.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)10.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle5.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription84.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate74.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households44.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+18.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age37.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$74,761$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$201,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$961$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.8 yr ± 1.5378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.53 years of 84.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured