Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51453

in Lohrville, IowaPopulation 500

49.95/ 100

Ranked #16,323 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #667 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.9 pCi/L

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.05%

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

17.6 mi

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

55.5 mi

in the top 10.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Lohrville, Iowa (ZIP 51453), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 49% nationally (16,323rd) and the bottom 28% of Iowa (667th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: recreation resides in the top 3.0% nationally, modeled transportation noise sits in the bottom 7.1% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 10.1% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise resides at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Crowded housing sits at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, modeled radon stands in the top 2.2% nationally, and distance to a community health center resides in the top 9.8% nationally. Modeled arsenic sits in the top 10.8% nationally, and binge drinking stands in the top 10.5% nationally. Modeled energy burden resides in the top 10.5% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 50579, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.4%27.9–34.9
High blood pressure among adults38.2%34.0–42.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.0–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.6–10.2
Depression among adults20.7%17.6–24.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.3–15.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.9%34.7–43.2
Obesity among adults41.4%33.1–49.6
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.8%9.6–14.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.5–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%77.5–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.5%75.0–81.7
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%83.9–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.1%64.1–73.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.9%62.2–69.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%70.5–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.1%15.9–22.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.0%15.1–20.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.4%22.9–32.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.3%26.3–38.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.9%17.0–23.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.6–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%12.8–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.1%12.4–16.1
Any disability among adults30.4%26.3–34.7
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.6
Independent living disability among adults8.1%7.0–9.2
Mobility disability among adults15.0%12.8–17.3
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.7
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.6%20.1–27.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%9.8–14.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.6–12.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.5–10.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.7–7.7
Loneliness among adults30.6%25.7–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–647.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription86.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate69.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households52.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+16.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age34.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$86,563$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$78,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$944$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.3 yr ± 1.7178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.71 years of 81.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured