Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50857

in Nodaway, IowaPopulation 156

50.98/ 100

Ranked #14,872 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #573 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

4 pCi/L

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

94.4%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

95.7%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST71st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

2.8%

in the top 11.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.89%

in the top 12.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

40.4%

in the top 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Nodaway, Iowa (ZIP 50857) sits in the top 46% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,872nd) and the bottom 38% of Iowa (573rd).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: unemployment sits at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Homeownership registers in the top 9.4% nationally, fiber broadband lands in the top 9.8% nationally, and poverty resides in the bottom 13.3% nationally. Crowded housing lies at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas settles in the bottom 20% nationally. On the other hand, modeled radon stands in the top 1.8% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure is in the top 11.6% nationally. Slow internet speeds rests in the top 12.4% nationally, and distance to a community health center sits in the top 14.9% nationally.

In plain language, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". ZIP 50864, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.2%29.7–37.0
High blood pressure among adults40.4%36.2–44.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.8–11.9
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.1–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.2–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.5–10.3
Depression among adults20.6%17.6–24.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%11.9–15.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.4%36.1–44.9
Obesity among adults40.8%32.7–49.2
Stroke among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.6%12.0–17.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.4–8.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.6%78.8–83.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%76.7–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.3–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.6%62.8–71.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.5%63.1–69.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.0%71.2–83.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.1%15.0–21.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.8%13.8–19.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.1%23.6–33.2
Short sleep duration among adults32.8%26.6–39.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.0%17.0–23.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.7–17.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%12.9–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.6–15.4
Any disability among adults30.9%26.8–35.5
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.8–9.9
Independent living disability among adults8.0%6.9–9.3
Mobility disability among adults15.7%13.4–18.3
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.5–4.7
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%19.3–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.7%9.2–14.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.3–13.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.1–10.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.3–7.4
Loneliness among adults30.7%25.9–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.2–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)1.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle1.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription90.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate94.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households88.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+42.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age62.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$63,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$163,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.9 yr ± 1.2278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.22 years of 76.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured