Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50577

in Renwick, IowaPopulation 341

44.94/ 100

Ranked #22,466 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranked #881 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 4.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.6 pCi/L

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

8.4%

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.4%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.1%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

10.1%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

9.2%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

4.6%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US77th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Renwick, Iowa (ZIP 50577) places in the bottom 30% nationally (22,466th) and the bottom 4.5% of Iowa (881st).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: unemployment settles at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden sits in the bottom 7.7% nationally. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas rests in the bottom 12.3% nationally. Crowded housing resides at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, modeled radon is in the top 3.9% nationally, binge drinking lands in the top 8.8% nationally, and arsenic stands in the top 11.6% nationally. Modeled obesity registers in the top 8.6% nationally, and fine-particle settles in the top 13.8% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 50430, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.5%28.6–34.4
High blood pressure among adults40.2%36.6–43.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.1–10.8
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.3–10.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.7–11.1
Depression among adults21.2%18.3–24.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.8–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%34.4–41.8
Obesity among adults43.1%36.0–50.0
Stroke among adults4.6%4.1–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.7%13.2–18.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.8%6.5–9.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.7–82.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.0%74.7–80.9
Cholesterol screening among adults83.3%81.3–85.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.1%63.7–72.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.3%58.1–64.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.0%69.4–81.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.4%16.5–22.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.8%16.2–21.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.1%24.8–33.5
Short sleep duration among adults35.1%29.7–41.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.2%19.4–25.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.9–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.9–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.9%14.1–17.7
Any disability among adults34.3%30.3–38.2
Hearing disability among adults10.1%9.1–11.2
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.5–10.7
Mobility disability among adults17.0%14.9–19.2
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.7%20.7–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.1%12.9–17.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.2%12.1–16.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.4–12.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Loneliness among adults31.3%27.2–35.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.2–9.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–643.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)5.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription87.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate89.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population5.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households72.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+20.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age53.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$57,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$107,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$746$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.7 yr ± 1.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.12 years of 80.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured