Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50545

in Hardy, IowaPopulation 139

43.13/ 100

Ranked #24,252 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #904 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 2.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.6 pCi/L

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.9%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.6%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.3%

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

45.5%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

98.7%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

18.1%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$31,429

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.06%

in the bottom 13.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

22.3%

in the top 14.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By its overall health score, Hardy, Iowa (ZIP 50545) lands in the bottom 24% nationally (24,252nd) and the bottom 2.0% of Iowa (904th).

continue reading

The measures that press hardest set the tone here: modeled radon lies in the top 4.1% nationally, and energy burden resides in the top 3.1% nationally. Modeled binge drinking lands in the top 4.2% nationally, and obesity registers in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled arsenic sits in the top 7.5% nationally, and household income rests in the bottom 2.3% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled pfas is in the bottom 5.5% nationally, and home broadband subscription stands in the top 6.2% nationally. Unemployment settles at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.

To translate a couple of terms, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 50542, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.0%26.5–33.6
High blood pressure among adults38.2%33.8–42.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.7–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.8–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.3–11.0
Depression among adults22.7%19.1–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.6%11.8–15.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.6%32.1–40.9
Obesity among adults45.5%36.5–53.8
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.8%12.8–19.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%5.8–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%74.7–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.8%72.9–80.3
Cholesterol screening among adults82.9%80.6–85.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.0%55.9–66.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.3%59.5–67.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%68.8–83.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.6%17.0–24.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.2%17.8–24.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.5%23.7–33.8
Short sleep duration among adults36.3%29.6–43.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.8%18.7–25.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%16.6–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.6–17.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.3%14.2–18.5
Any disability among adults32.1%27.4–36.8
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.2–9.2
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
Mobility disability among adults15.6%13.4–18.1
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.8–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.7%19.9–27.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.9%13.0–19.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.9%12.9–19.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.7–14.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.5–10.1
Loneliness among adults31.1%26.1–36.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.8–10.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–641.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)5.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription98.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate84.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households56.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+12.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age56.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$31,429$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.6 yr ± 2.0378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.03 years of 81.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured