Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50226

in Polk City, IowaPopulation 7,759

62.25/ 100

Ranked #3,364 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 10.5%)

Ranked #33 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 3.6%)

Ranked #15 of 85 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

23.2%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$153,011

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.3%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.7%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.3%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.1%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.3%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

4.9%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

17.4%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.1%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Polk City, Iowa (ZIP 50226), by its composite score, sits in the top 10.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,364th) and the top 3.6% of Iowa (33rd).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: household income settles in the top 3.6% nationally, and modeled food insecurity sits in the bottom 4.7% nationally. Modeled transportation lies in the bottom 5.1% nationally, and mobility disability rests in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Modeled independent living disability resides in the bottom 3.1% nationally, stroke is in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and tooth loss lands in the bottom 2.0% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity stands in the bottom 8.1% nationally. On the other side, modeled binge drinking registers in the top 1.1% nationally, and arsenic settles in the top 8.0% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 50023, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 99%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Disability

healthier than 99%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 23.6; chronic-disease standing 90.3 (top 10%) — 67 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,092 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.5%22.4–26.9
High blood pressure among adults28.7%26.3–31.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults4.7%4.1–5.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.6%3.8–5.5
Depression among adults22.2%19.7–24.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.3%7.2–9.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.0%31.2–36.9
Obesity among adults35.4%31.8–39.3
Stroke among adults2.3%2.0–2.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years4.9%3.9–5.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.5%3.4–5.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.9%71.7–77.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.8%73.0–78.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%84.6–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.3%63.6–70.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.3%72.9–77.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.8%73.1–83.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults23.2%20.5–26.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.2%8.8–13.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.9%15.2–20.8
Short sleep duration among adults30.9%27.5–34.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.9%10.9–15.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%13.9–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults10.8%9.4–12.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.9%9.3–12.6
Any disability among adults21.2%18.4–23.9
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.9
Independent living disability among adults5.1%4.3–5.9
Mobility disability among adults8.3%7.0–9.7
Self-care disability among adults2.2%1.9–2.6
Vision disability among adults2.6%2.3–3.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.9–23.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%5.7–9.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.3–7.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.7–8.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.9–5.7
Loneliness among adults30.7%27.7–33.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.0–5.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–646.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)1.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle3.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription95.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate89.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households57.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+15.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age41.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$153,011$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$417,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$867$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.6 yr ± 1.1378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.13 years of 81.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured