ZIP code
49961
in Sidnaw, MichiganPopulation 104
56.54/ 100
Ranked #7,717 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 24%)
Ranked #206 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 21%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Short sleep
25.3%
in the bottom 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Industrial-pollution burden
in the bottom 1.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
12.7%
in the top 2.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
29.8 mi
in the top 2.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST96thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
77.3%
in the top 0.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
5.9%
in the bottom 2.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Air-toxics cancer risk
10 per million
in the bottom 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
11.4%
in the top 3.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
10.7%
in the bottom 2.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›The read
By its overall health score, Sidnaw, Michigan (ZIP 49961) lands in the top 24% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,717th) and the top 21% of Michigan (206th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled short sleep rests in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands in the top 2.0% nationally, and modeled colon screening settles in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lies in the bottom 2.4% nationally, homeownership resides at the national maximum, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Modeled binge drinking registers in the bottom 2.4% nationally. On the other hand, modeled hearing disability sits in the top 2.6% nationally, and coronary heart disease rests in the top 3.0% nationally.
To translate a couple of terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 49952, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 62%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 94%
14%
Preventive Care
in the top 0.4%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 98%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 86%
8%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
in the top 0.06%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 10%
21%
Disability
healthier than 37%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 4%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 66%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 92%
14%
Preventive Care
in the top 0.6%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 98%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 97%
8%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
in the top 0.00%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 7%
21%
Disability
healthier than 31%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 2%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
49908
Michiganshares a border
Score 40.54
Closest healthier
49952
Michiganshares a border
Score 57.67
Similar health profile
04673
Maine99% similar profile
Score 55.38
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 42.6% | 38.3–47.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 47.2% | 42.3–52.2 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 16.4% | 14.6–18.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.6% | 9.4–12.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 11.4% | 9.6–13.4 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 10.7% | 8.4–13.2 |
| Depression among adults | 21.6% | 18.4–25.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 15.4% | 13.0–18.2 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 43.9% | 39.1–48.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 33.4% | 26.3–41.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 5.3% | 4.4–6.3 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 6.2% | 4.9–7.7 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 4.9% | 3.4–6.9 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 86.5% | 84.0–88.7 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 86.8% | 84.3–89.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 93.3% | 92.0–94.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 77.3% | 73.0–81.0 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 78.1% | 75.3–80.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 78.5% | 71.6–84.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 10.7% | 8.7–13.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 11.6% | 8.8–14.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 26.0% | 20.4–32.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 25.3% | 20.3–30.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 19.3% | 15.5–23.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 12.9% | 11.0–15.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 15.3% | 12.8–18.2 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 11.2% | 9.2–13.4 |
| Any disability among adults | 36.9% | 31.1–43.0 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 12.7% | 10.8–14.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 8.3% | 6.7–10.3 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 18.8% | 15.2–23.0 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.0% | 3.2–4.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.0% | 4.0–6.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 18.8% | 15.3–22.9 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.7% | 6.3–11.5 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 7.9% | 5.5–10.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 5.9% | 4.5–7.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 4.8% | 3.8–5.9 |
| Loneliness among adults | 27.5% | 22.6–32.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 4.4% | 3.4–5.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 21.2% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 37.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 1.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 23.5% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 22.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 10.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974 |
| Households without a vehicle | 8.5% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973 |
| Broadband subscription | 86.4% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 25.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 22.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 85.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.7% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975 |
| Single-parent households | 96.2% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 56.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970 |
| Population 65+ | 63.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975 |
| Median age | 73.1 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974 |
| Median household income | $53,750 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962 |
| Median home value | $86,200 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $972 ($719–$1,368) n=849 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 80.9 yr ± 1.14 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.14 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured