Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49801

in Iron Mountain, MichiganPopulation 11,860

50.16/ 100

Ranked #16,012 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranked #488 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

78 mi

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.26 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

25.1 mi

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

18.5 per million

in the bottom 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

6 ppb

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

US92nd
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.55%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

52.6%

in the top 20% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US80th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

Iron Mountain, Michigan (ZIP 49801), by its overall standing, sits in the top 50% healthiest ZIPs nationally (16,012th) and the bottom 50% of Michigan (488th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 5.4% nationally, and elder services settles in the top 5.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room registers at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Physicians stands in the top 6.2% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the bottom 6.9% nationally. By contrast, modeled expected annual loss is in the top 2.5% nationally, and disaster risk resides in the top 3.7% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests in the top 5.7% nationally, and lead in tap water lies in the top 7.9% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Held up against its neighbors, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 49802, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.7%30.0–37.2
High blood pressure among adults39.2%34.9–43.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.8–11.8
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.5–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.5–10.7
Depression among adults28.2%24.3–32.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%11.0–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.7%33.2–41.9
Obesity among adults38.9%30.6–46.8
Stroke among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.2%9.0–13.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%5.0–7.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.4%76.5–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.3%77.8–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.5–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.4%65.7–74.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.2%64.8–71.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.6%69.2–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.0–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.9%13.6–18.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.2%21.7–30.6
Short sleep duration among adults31.2%25.3–37.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.8%17.2–22.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.6–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%13.4–17.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.7%12.9–16.4
Any disability among adults34.5%29.9–38.9
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.9–9.9
Independent living disability among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
Mobility disability among adults15.8%13.7–17.8
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.3%17.8–25.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.1%10.9–15.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.9%10.8–15.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.2–11.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.3–8.4
Loneliness among adults31.0%25.8–36.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.4–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–644.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)4.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle8.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription88.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate81.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population1.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households59.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+23.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age47.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$67,337$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$168,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$747$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.4 yr ± 0.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.82 years of 79.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured