Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49682

in Suttons Bay, MichiganPopulation 4,699

60.11/ 100

Ranked #4,777 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.9%)

Ranked #119 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 12.3%)

Ranked #9 of 28 Traverse City, MI ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

76.9%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.23 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

18.3 per million

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.1 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97%

in the top 10.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.4%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Suttons Bay, Michigan (ZIP 49682) ranks in the top 14.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,777th) and the top 12.3% of Michigan (119th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that set this area apart are worth putting up front: modeled colon screening lands in the top 1.2% nationally, and dental providers sits in the top 3.0% nationally. Grocery is in the top 5.5% nationally, and recreation settles in the top 6.3% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 6.8% nationally, and fatal road crashes registers in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Modeled extreme heat rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Home broadband subscription stands in the top 10.2% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled short sleep lands in the bottom 13.0% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Close by, ZIP 49653, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Traverse City, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 97%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 88%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.5%30.6–38.6
High blood pressure among adults39.0%34.4–43.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.4%11.2–13.6
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.7–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.3–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%6.9–9.3
Depression among adults24.1%20.4–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%10.7–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.2%34.4–44.0
Obesity among adults32.9%25.0–41.3
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.1%5.8–8.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.4%4.3–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.8%78.7–84.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.3%80.1–86.0
Cholesterol screening among adults91.2%89.9–92.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years76.9%72.6–80.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.5%69.2–75.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%72.3–85.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%11.9–17.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.0%9.9–14.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.6%17.6–26.2
Short sleep duration among adults30.7%24.7–37.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.0%14.5–19.8
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%12.6–16.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%11.9–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.7%10.1–13.4
Any disability among adults30.7%26.2–35.3
Hearing disability among adults9.0%7.9–10.2
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.3–8.4
Mobility disability among adults14.3%12.1–16.6
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.0%16.9–23.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.2–12.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.0–10.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.7–9.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.1–6.9
Loneliness among adults29.0%24.5–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.0–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–644.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)2.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)47.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)7.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription97.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate91.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population3.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households65.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+31.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age54.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$97,813$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$396,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,170$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 0.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.89 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured