Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49628

in Elberta, MichiganPopulation 174

52.80/ 100

Ranked #12,367 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #374 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #21 of 28 Traverse City, MI ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

21.5 mi

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

10.0%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

63.9%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

10.5 days/year

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

95.7%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Elberta, Michigan (ZIP 49628) lands in the top 39% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,367th) and the top 38% of Michigan (374th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: poverty resides at the national minimum, and home broadband subscription lands at the national maximum. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits in the top 4.2% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the bottom 6.0% nationally, modeled humid heat is in the bottom 7.6% nationally, and homeownership stands in the top 7.7% nationally. Modeled short sleep settles in the bottom 7.1% nationally. Against that, crowded housing lies in the top 4.6% nationally, and modeled pfas resides in the top 6.4% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 49613, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Traverse City, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.04%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.7%31.6–39.7
High blood pressure among adults40.3%35.6–45.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.8%10.5–13.0
Current asthma among adults11.3%9.9–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.5–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%7.9–11.6
Depression among adults26.6%22.6–31.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.4–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.7%34.0–43.7
Obesity among adults36.7%28.2–45.7
Stroke among adults4.3%3.6–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.4%10.8–16.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%4.7–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.1%78.3–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.8%78.5–84.9
Cholesterol screening among adults88.8%86.8–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.8%67.1–76.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.4%67.0–73.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.2%67.2–81.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.3–18.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.1%11.0–17.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.2%20.2–30.7
Short sleep duration among adults29.4%23.4–35.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.8%16.4–23.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.3–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.1–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.0%11.8–16.4
Any disability among adults34.2%29.1–39.5
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.1–10.7
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.4–10.4
Mobility disability among adults16.3%13.6–19.4
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.4–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.3–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.4%17.0–23.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%9.2–15.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.8%8.9–15.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.1–10.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.6–8.1
Loneliness among adults30.1%25.2–35.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.5–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–6427.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)1.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate95.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)10.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households95.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+44.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age53.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$114,375$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$267,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 1.2878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.28 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured