Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49436

in Mears, MichiganPopulation 1,644

51.21/ 100

Ranked #14,522 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #437 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

13.6%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

12.5 days/year

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.0%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

83.4%

in the top 21% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US79th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Mears, Michigan (ZIP 49436) comes out in the top 45% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,522nd) and the top 45% of Michigan (437th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: fatal road crashes is at the national minimum, recreation resides in the top 5.5% nationally, and modeled colon screening rests in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled humid heat lies in the bottom 9.4% nationally, homeownership sits in the top 12.5% nationally, and modeled loneliness settles in the bottom 14.9% nationally. By contrast, unemployment registers in the top 4.8% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease stands in the top 9.7% nationally. Modeled pfas lands in the top 11.9% nationally, and hearing disability is in the top 13.5% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 49449, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.4%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.2%34.1–41.9
High blood pressure among adults43.3%38.5–47.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.7%11.4–13.9
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults10.0%8.7–11.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.6%8.9–12.4
Depression among adults25.2%21.4–28.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.9%12.7–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.5%36.8–45.9
Obesity among adults39.4%30.8–47.1
Stroke among adults4.7%4.2–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.4%10.7–16.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.2–8.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.0%80.3–85.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.4%79.3–85.1
Cholesterol screening among adults90.2%88.8–91.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.0%69.4–78.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.9%64.3–71.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.5%67.8–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.7%11.1–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%12.3–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.5%21.5–31.4
Short sleep duration among adults31.5%25.3–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.0%17.7–24.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.5–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.3%14.1–18.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.5–15.3
Any disability among adults35.2%30.3–39.9
Hearing disability among adults10.5%9.2–11.8
Independent living disability among adults8.9%7.6–10.3
Mobility disability among adults17.9%15.1–20.9
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.8–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.7–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.3–24.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.3–15.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.6–14.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.5–10.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.8
Loneliness among adults29.1%24.5–34.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.8–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–6410.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)4.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)13.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle3.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription90.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate92.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population3.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households69.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+33.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age59.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$67,279$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$255,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,013$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 0.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.82 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured