Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48453

in Marlette, MichiganPopulation 5,046

44.46/ 100

Ranked #22,960 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #816 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

39.4%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.61 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

16.8 mi

in the top 10.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

13.6%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Marlette, Michigan (ZIP 48453) comes out in the bottom 28% nationally (22,960th) and the bottom 16% of Michigan (816th).

continue reading

The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: modeled arsenic sits in the top 1.7% nationally, and distance to a community health center settles in the top 10.6% nationally. More encouragingly, mental-health providers registers in the top 1.3% nationally, grocery stands in the top 2.3% nationally, and floodplain exposure lands at the national minimum. Pharmacy is in the top 3.3% nationally. Distance to an emergency room resides at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Dental providers rests in the top 10.7% nationally, and outpatient lies in the top 11.5% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs.

In plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 48416, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.3%30.3–36.4
High blood pressure among adults39.9%36.2–43.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.2–10.9
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.6–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%8.0–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
Depression among adults28.4%25.0–31.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.9–15.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.7%33.9–41.4
Obesity among adults40.3%32.8–47.4
Stroke among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.8%13.3–18.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.1%6.8–9.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.6%76.2–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%76.6–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%84.2–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.3%64.0–72.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.2%60.0–66.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.0%65.8–79.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.4–18.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.9%16.6–21.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.9%26.6–35.5
Short sleep duration among adults32.7%27.3–38.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.8%20.2–25.7
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%17.4–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.9–18.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.9%15.1–18.9
Any disability among adults37.2%33.2–41.5
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.6–10.6
Independent living disability among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
Mobility disability among adults17.4%15.4–19.7
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.4–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.6%20.3–27.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.8%14.4–19.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.9%14.4–19.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.4–13.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.7–10.0
Loneliness among adults32.9%28.3–37.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.8–10.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–6411.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)10.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)6.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle9.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription83.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate76.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population1.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households51.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+18.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age39.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$53,676$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$163,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$896$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.9 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 77.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured