Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47926

in Burnettsville, IndianaPopulation 863

47.68/ 100

Ranked #19,341 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #410 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

31%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

44.2%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US9th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.4%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

7 mi

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US80th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Burnettsville, Indiana (ZIP 47926) stands in the bottom 40% nationally (19,341st) and the bottom 46% of Indiana (410th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 9.4% nationally, and housing-cost burden stands in the bottom 11.9% nationally. Homeownership sits in the top 13.6% nationally, and unemployment resides in the bottom 15.0% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled arsenic sits in the top 3.0% nationally, modeled obesity resides in the top 5.8% nationally, and crowded housing stands in the top 9.8% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Recreation resides at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

For clarity, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. ZIP 47950, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.1%30.3–35.9
High blood pressure among adults40.6%37.2–43.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.1–10.8
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.1–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.2–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.5–10.6
Depression among adults25.7%22.8–28.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.6–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.5%38.0–45.0
Obesity among adults44.2%37.9–50.3
Stroke among adults3.9%3.5–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.0%11.9–16.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.9%6.6–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%77.5–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%78.1–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.6–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.1%64.4–71.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.4%56.4–62.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.2%68.0–79.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.9–18.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.3%15.1–19.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.6%23.0–30.4
Short sleep duration among adults37.5%32.5–42.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.4%18.9–24.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.7–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.5–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%13.3–16.6
Any disability among adults32.6%29.1–36.3
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.2
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.2
Mobility disability among adults15.8%13.9–17.7
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.4–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.7%20.1–25.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.6%10.9–14.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.1–8.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.4–10.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Loneliness among adults32.0%28.3–35.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–643.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)5.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)0.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle1.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription84.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate91.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households56.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+22.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age34.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$77,917$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$145,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$943$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured