Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47921

in Boswell, IndianaPopulation 1,338

44.76/ 100

Ranked #22,666 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranked #547 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #24 of 29 Lafayette-West Lafayette, IN ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a community health center

21.4 mi

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US7th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

17.8%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

5.5%

in the top 12.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

42.8%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

4.8%

in the top 12.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

7.6 mi

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

15.1%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$100,455

in the top 19% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US81st
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

Boswell, Indiana (ZIP 47921), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 29% nationally (22,666th) and the bottom 28% of Indiana (547th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled disaster risk stands in the bottom 7.5% nationally, and unemployment lands in the bottom 15% nationally. By contrast, distance to a community health center is in the top 7.5% nationally, modeled arsenic resides in the top 7.7% nationally, and crowded housing rests in the top 12.2% nationally. Modeled tooth loss lies in the top 11.7% nationally, and obesity sits in the top 9.8% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled energy burden registers in the top 12.0% nationally. Recreation stands at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

Defined in plain terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 47917, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Lafayette-West Lafayette, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.2%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.6%26.7–32.7
High blood pressure among adults37.8%34.0–41.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.4–8.9
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.1–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.4–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.8–10.3
Depression among adults25.7%22.4–29.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%12.1–15.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.6%34.7–42.6
Obesity among adults42.8%35.1–51.0
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.3%19.3–26.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.3%10.2–14.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.5–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%75.3–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.8%82.7–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.9%60.9–69.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.3%56.2–63.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.1%68.1–81.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.3–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.0%15.3–20.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.6%24.3–33.1
Short sleep duration among adults36.4%31.4–43.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.7%20.6–26.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.5–20.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.4%13.5–17.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%14.6–18.7
Any disability among adults34.7%30.3–39.0
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.5
Independent living disability among adults9.0%7.9–10.1
Mobility disability among adults15.9%13.8–18.1
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.4%20.9–28.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.1%14.3–20.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.1–11.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.1–15.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.4–9.8
Loneliness among adults33.8%29.1–38.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.9–10.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6416.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)8.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)0.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription94.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate81.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population10.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households49.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+14.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age37.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$100,455$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$165,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$864$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 0.9478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.94 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured