Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47546

in Jasper, IndianaPopulation 22,191

52.61/ 100

Ranked #12,606 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #151 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.22 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.13 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 13.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US87th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.71 per 1,000 residents

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.3%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

32.5%

in the bottom 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US24th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

28.5 mi

in the top 30% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US70th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Jasper, Indiana (ZIP 47546) sits in the top 39% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,606th) and the top 20% of Indiana (151st).

continue reading

Where this area does well, the measures make it plain: distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Grocery registers in the top 6.0% nationally, mental-health providers lands in the top 7.7% nationally, and physicians resides in the top 9.5% nationally. Dental providers lies in the top 10.9% nationally. Distance to a community health center settles at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing stands in the top 12.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home is at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Against that, modeled arsenic rests in the top 11.1% nationally, and disaster risk sits in the top 13.2% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. ZIP 47521, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 89%

8%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.0%27.8–34.2
High blood pressure among adults37.7%33.9–41.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.7–10.5
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.7–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.5–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Depression among adults23.5%20.2–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.4–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.2%36.1–44.5
Obesity among adults39.9%33.1–47.0
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.5%10.9–16.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%7.3–10.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%76.0–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%77.0–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.9%85.2–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.5%63.4–73.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.3%59.5–67.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.5%67.5–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%13.0–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.1%13.1–17.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.8%21.0–28.7
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%26.4–39.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.4%17.9–23.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.7–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%12.5–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%12.9–16.3
Any disability among adults30.9%27.1–34.8
Hearing disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Independent living disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.8
Mobility disability among adults14.6%12.8–16.5
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.3–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.7%19.5–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.6–14.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.1–8.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.3–11.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Loneliness among adults31.8%27.1–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.1–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–647.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)8.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)1.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle5.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription87.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate70.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population4.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households60.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+20.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age40.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$73,659$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$252,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$818$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.3 yr ± 0.5378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.53 years of 78.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured