Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47438

in Jasonville, IndianaPopulation 4,180

35.30/ 100

Ranked #29,278 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.7%)

Ranked #729 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 3.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

44.5%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29%

in the top 10.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.8%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

9.9%

in the top 10.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

19.3%

in the top 12.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

17.1%

in the top 11.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

11.9%

in the top 11.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

21.1%

in the top 12.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

69.6%

in the bottom 12.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

44.8%

in the top 13.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Jasonville, Indiana (ZIP 47438) lands in the bottom 8.7% nationally (29,278th) and the bottom 3.7% of Indiana (729th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: distance to a community health center resides at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled obesity settles in the top 5.3% nationally, fair or poor health is in the top 10.4% nationally, and high cholesterol sits in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lands in the top 10.5% nationally, and cognitive disability lies in the top 12.6% nationally. Modeled diabetes stands in the top 11.4% nationally, and independent living disability rests in the top 11.9% nationally. Modeled mobility disability registers in the top 12.9% nationally, and tooth loss resides in the top 11.9% nationally.

Put simply, distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. On the overall standing, ZIP 47427, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.6%32.9–38.4
High blood pressure among adults44.8%41.6–48.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.9–10.4
Current asthma among adults12.2%11.0–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults9.9%9.0–10.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.4%12.2–14.9
Depression among adults27.8%24.7–31.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.1%15.4–18.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.8%40.4–47.2
Obesity among adults44.5%38.6–50.3
Stroke among adults5.0%4.6–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.2%19.2–25.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.2%8.6–12.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.0%77.9–81.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%77.0–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults83.9%81.9–85.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.8%59.7–67.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.3%50.3–56.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.6%62.9–75.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%13.5–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.8%21.4–26.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.5%29.7–37.6
Short sleep duration among adults36.3%31.3–41.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.0%26.3–32.1
Frequent mental distress among adults20.2%18.4–22.1
Frequent physical distress among adults18.5%16.8–20.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.3%17.5–21.3
Any disability among adults40.2%36.6–44.2
Hearing disability among adults10.1%9.2–11.1
Independent living disability among adults11.9%10.7–13.2
Mobility disability among adults21.1%19.1–23.3
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Vision disability among adults7.4%6.7–8.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%21.1–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.7%18.1–23.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.0%13.0–17.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.8–15.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.1%9.0–11.3
Loneliness among adults33.2%29.5–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–647.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)9.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)6.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle7.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription81.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate79.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households43.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+16.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age41.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$56,941$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$126,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$811$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.5 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 75.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured