Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47348

in Hartford City, IndianaPopulation 9,080

37.02/ 100

Ranked #28,516 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 11.1%)

Ranked #722 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 4.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Obesity

45%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

6.6 ppb

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

US93rd
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3 pCi/L

in the top 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.63 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.1%

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.11 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

17.2%

in the top 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

21%

in the top 13.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

27.8%

in the top 13.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Hartford City, Indiana (ZIP 47348) stands in the bottom 11.1% nationally (28,516th) and the bottom 4.7% of Indiana (722nd).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: civic resides in the top 9.0% nationally, and mental-health providers stands in the top 10.3% nationally. On the other side, modeled obesity sits in the top 4.4% nationally, and lead in tap water resides in the top 6.7% nationally. Modeled tooth loss stands in the top 8.8% nationally, radon sits in the top 10.1% nationally, and coronary heart disease resides in the top 9.0% nationally. Modeled diabetes stands in the top 11.0% nationally, mobility disability sits in the top 13.2% nationally, and fair or poor health resides in the top 13.4% nationally.

For clarity, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. ZIP 46952, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.5 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $50,426 predicts 77.4 years — 1.9 years below.

    Ranked #2,387 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.5 ± 1.7 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.2 years — 2.7 years below them.

    Ranked #2,113 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.9%32.3–39.7
High blood pressure among adults44.9%40.5–49.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.2–11.1
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.6–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults10.1%9.1–11.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.2%11.8–14.8
Depression among adults27.1%23.3–31.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.2%15.2–19.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.7%38.3–47.4
Obesity among adults45.0%36.6–53.8
Stroke among adults5.1%4.7–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.0%20.1–28.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.8%8.3–11.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.7%78.1–83.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%76.8–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.7–86.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.9%58.7–68.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.3%50.6–57.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.2%61.6–77.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%11.8–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.0%19.3–25.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.3%27.6–37.6
Short sleep duration among adults37.9%31.2–45.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.8%24.8–31.4
Frequent mental distress among adults19.4%17.4–21.8
Frequent physical distress among adults18.1%16.1–20.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.4%16.5–20.6
Any disability among adults39.6%35.1–44.4
Hearing disability among adults10.3%9.3–11.5
Independent living disability among adults11.6%10.3–12.9
Mobility disability among adults21.0%18.6–23.8
Self-care disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Vision disability among adults7.3%6.6–8.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.3–26.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.5%16.5–22.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.3%12.2–16.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.0%11.1–15.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.6–11.1
Loneliness among adults31.9%26.7–37.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.3–12.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6413.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)9.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle10.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription84.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate73.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households53.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+23.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age42.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$50,426$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$109,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$705$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.5 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 75.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured