Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

47326

in Bryant, IndianaPopulation 1,803

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

40.24/ 100

Ranked #26,594 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #686 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 9.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

54.3%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

24.6%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

49.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.7%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

25.6%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

8.0%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

18.9%

in the top 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

3 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US16th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$48,438

in the bottom 12.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Bryant, Indiana (ZIP 47326) lands in the bottom 17% nationally (26,594th) and the bottom 9.4% of Indiana (686th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: homeownership lands in the top 11.3% nationally, and modeled disaster risk lies in the bottom 12.2% nationally. On the other side, home broadband subscription stands in the bottom 2.1% nationally, households without a vehicle rests in the top 3.3% nationally, and fatal road crashes registers in the top 3.9% nationally. Modeled energy burden resides in the top 3.8% nationally, and tooth loss settles in the top 6.6% nationally. Crowded housing is in the top 6.8% nationally, and modeled arsenic sits in the top 13.4% nationally. Modeled radon lands in the top 15% nationally.

Put simply, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. On the overall standing, ZIP 45822, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.9%24.9–31.0
High blood pressure among adults36.9%33.0–40.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.4–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.4–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.5–11.1
Depression among adults27.5%23.9–31.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%11.0–14.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.3%34.3–42.4
Obesity among adults41.7%33.9–49.9
Stroke among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.6%21.4–30.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.6%8.5–12.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.4%72.6–77.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.4%72.5–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults80.9%78.2–83.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.3%58.8–69.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.4%48.6–56.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.8%66.8–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%14.5–20.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.3%17.3–23.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.8%24.1–33.6
Short sleep duration among adults38.7%32.0–45.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.4%20.2–26.8
Frequent mental distress among adults20.8%18.4–23.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.7–17.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.9%16.5–21.6
Any disability among adults35.6%31.0–40.4
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.9–8.7
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.5–11.2
Mobility disability among adults15.3%13.2–17.5
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.8%21.2–28.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.0%13.9–20.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.4–12.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.1–14.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.5–10.3
Loneliness among adults35.2%30.0–40.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.3–9.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6433.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)25.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)1.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle24.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription54.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate93.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)8.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households43.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+18.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age24.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$48,438$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$157,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$739$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.7 yr ± 1.4678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.46 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured