Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47175

in Taswell, IndianaPopulation 847

34.95/ 100

Ranked #29,412 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.3%)

Ranked #732 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 3.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Coronary heart disease

11.4%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19.5%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.5%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.4%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.2%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

6.2%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

30.5%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.7%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US7th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.6%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

Taswell, Indiana (ZIP 47175), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 8.3% nationally (29,412th) and the bottom 3.4% of Indiana (732nd).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: housing-cost burden lies in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and modeled disaster risk registers in the bottom 6.6% nationally. On the other hand, modeled coronary heart disease is in the top 3.0% nationally, diabetes lies in the top 4.6% nationally, and high blood pressure registers in the top 5.2% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol is in the top 3.7% nationally, and mobility disability lies in the top 6.4% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health registers in the top 7.5% nationally, and self-care disability is in the top 7.4% nationally. Modeled stroke lies in the top 6.9% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 47118, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.0%35.3–43.0
High blood pressure among adults48.5%44.0–53.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.4–11.6
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.7–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults11.4%9.9–12.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults15.2%12.8–18.0
Depression among adults26.8%23.2–31.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.5%16.9–22.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.4%41.0–50.1
Obesity among adults44.9%36.8–53.6
Stroke among adults5.6%4.9–6.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.3%20.6–28.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.9%7.5–12.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.3%79.7–84.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.3%78.2–84.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%83.7–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.2%59.3–68.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.0%49.4–56.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.1%61.8–77.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.6%11.3–16.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults25.0%20.3–29.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.4%28.7–40.6
Short sleep duration among adults37.7%31.0–44.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.5%25.9–35.5
Frequent mental distress among adults19.0%16.7–21.5
Frequent physical distress among adults19.7%17.1–22.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.5%15.8–21.5
Any disability among adults41.1%35.8–46.8
Hearing disability among adults11.1%9.7–12.5
Independent living disability among adults12.0%10.1–14.2
Mobility disability among adults23.2%19.7–27.0
Self-care disability among adults6.7%5.6–7.9
Vision disability among adults8.0%6.7–9.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%19.2–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.6%16.4–25.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.4%12.0–19.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%10.8–16.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.3–11.9
Loneliness among adults30.8%25.8–36.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.3–13.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–641.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)12.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle3.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription92.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)6.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate84.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households49.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+15.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age36.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$115,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.3 yr ± 0.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.84 years of 76.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured