Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46540

in Middlebury, IndianaPopulation 12,993

45.44/ 100

Ranked #21,947 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #518 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #6 of 11 Elkhart-Goshen, IN ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

21.4%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

74.4%

in the bottom 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.0%

in the bottom 13.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

36.2%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US84th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

18.4%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Middlebury, Indiana (ZIP 46540), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 32% nationally (21,947th) and the bottom 32% of Indiana (518th).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: modeled energy burden registers in the bottom 13.9% nationally. Against that, modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the top 3.1% nationally, households without a vehicle lies in the top 4.1% nationally, and home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 9.3% nationally. Modeled pfas is in the top 15% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled loneliness registers in the top 16% nationally, and arsenic is in the top 16% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site lies in the bottom 17% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability registers in the top 18% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 46507, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Elkhart-Goshen, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.5 ± 2.6 years. A median household income of $96,615 predicts 79.9 years — 3.6 years above.

    Ranked #275 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.5 ± 2.6 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.6 years — 4.9 years above them.

    Ranked #161 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.2%24.6–29.8
High blood pressure among adults35.9%32.6–39.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.1–8.5
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.7–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.3%8.3–10.3
Depression among adults27.5%24.3–30.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.3–13.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%34.5–41.3
Obesity among adults41.2%35.9–46.3
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.7%13.2–18.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.6%8.9–12.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.9%71.1–76.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.5%74.5–80.3
Cholesterol screening among adults82.5%80.4–84.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.6%59.1–67.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.7%56.4–62.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.1%69.5–81.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.8%15.2–20.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.7%16.2–21.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.9%21.4–28.4
Short sleep duration among adults34.9%30.4–39.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.3%19.7–25.0
Frequent mental distress among adults20.2%18.1–22.3
Frequent physical distress among adults15.3%13.6–17.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.4%16.3–20.4
Any disability among adults35.0%31.1–38.9
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.2
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.3–10.4
Mobility disability among adults15.1%13.3–17.0
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.9%22.8–29.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.5%13.3–17.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.5–10.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.2–13.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.1–9.2
Loneliness among adults36.2%32.1–40.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.0%7.0–9.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6431.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)29.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle21.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription74.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate84.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population2.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households50.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+13.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age32.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$96,615$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$313,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,148$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.5 yr ± 1.3178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.31 years of 83.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured