Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46171

in Reelsville, IndianaPopulation 2,018

39.06/ 100

Ranked #27,351 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.8%)

Ranked #705 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 6.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Poverty rate

1.0%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

97.4%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.56 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

23.7%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.3%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

69.7%

in the bottom 12.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

16.8%

in the top 12.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

9.6%

in the top 13.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

40.5%

in the top 14.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

57.7%

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

Reelsville, Indiana (ZIP 46171), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 14.8% nationally (27,351st) and the bottom 6.9% of Indiana (705th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: poverty lies in the bottom 5.3% nationally. Unemployment settles at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband stands in the top 7.7% nationally. Households without a vehicle is at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Childcare rests in the top 8.3% nationally. On the other hand, modeled tooth loss sits in the top 9.2% nationally, and high cholesterol registers in the top 9.4% nationally. Modeled obesity lands in the top 10.2% nationally, mammography resides in the bottom 12.8% nationally, and diabetes lies in the top 12.8% nationally.

A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 46120, just across the boundary. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.1%31.2–39.0
High blood pressure among adults44.1%39.5–48.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.8–10.9
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.5–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.6%8.4–11.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.4%10.3–14.6
Depression among adults26.6%22.8–30.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.8%14.3–19.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.3%38.9–47.9
Obesity among adults42.7%34.7–50.8
Stroke among adults4.7%4.1–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.7%19.7–28.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%7.0–11.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.0%78.1–83.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%77.0–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.1–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.0%54.8–65.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.7%51.9–59.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.7%61.2–77.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%12.0–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.4%18.2–26.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.2%25.4–36.8
Short sleep duration among adults40.5%34.2–47.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.3%21.9–30.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.7%16.4–21.2
Frequent physical distress among adults17.6%15.0–20.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%14.8–20.0
Any disability among adults37.8%32.2–43.1
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.4–10.9
Independent living disability among adults10.3%8.7–12.0
Mobility disability among adults19.4%16.1–22.7
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.4–6.1
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.4–7.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.2%19.5–27.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.3%13.7–21.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.3%8.8–14.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%9.8–14.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.2–10.1
Loneliness among adults32.2%27.1–37.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.7–10.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–642.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)12.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription95.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate90.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households62.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+12.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age36.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$83,607$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$287,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.0 yr ± 2.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.60 years of 81.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured