Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45384

in Wilberforce, OhioPopulation 1,919

54.81/ 100

Ranked #9,687 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #192 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #15 of 57 Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

16.9%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

50.4%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

2.2%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

2.1%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

21%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

4.7%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

1.4%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

5.7%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

15.6%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Wilberforce, Ohio (ZIP 45384) sits in the top 30% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,687th) and the top 16% of Ohio (192nd).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled high cholesterol stands in the bottom 0.8% nationally, hearing disability resides in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and coronary heart disease sits in the bottom 1.1% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure stands in the bottom 1.5% nationally, diabetes resides in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and stroke sits in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Modeled mobility disability stands in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and fatal road crashes resides at the national minimum. On the other hand, modeled loneliness sits in the top 0.2% nationally, and unemployment stands in the top 3.5% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 45314, about 0.3 miles away. Across other measures, the ZIP also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 99%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 40.0; chronic-disease standing 97.1 (top 10%) — 57 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,115 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults9.7%8.3–11.2
High blood pressure among adults21.0%17.6–24.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults1.8%1.6–2.0
Current asthma among adults14.0%11.7–16.3
Coronary heart disease among adults2.1%1.8–2.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults2.8%2.1–3.7
Depression among adults23.6%19.4–27.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults4.7%3.9–5.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened16.9%14.6–19.5
Obesity among adults36.6%29.7–44.2
Stroke among adults1.4%1.2–1.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.1%17.7–24.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%3.9–14.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure48.0%44.9–51.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%73.8–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults74.6%65.8–81.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.7%65.1–74.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.1%60.7–67.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.0%66.8–80.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.2–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.7%4.8–11.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.7%14.4–30.4
Short sleep duration among adults42.6%37.4–48.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.4%10.5–23.5
Frequent mental distress among adults24.3%18.1–29.1
Frequent physical distress among adults8.5%6.3–11.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.5%12.7–27.6
Any disability among adults27.7%19.7–37.4
Hearing disability among adults2.2%1.9–2.6
Independent living disability among adults9.8%6.1–14.9
Mobility disability among adults5.7%4.3–7.6
Self-care disability among adults2.1%1.6–2.9
Vision disability among adults4.6%3.2–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.8%23.1–39.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.2%12.1–38.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.7%7.5–29.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.7%10.3–27.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.0%9.5–23.5
Loneliness among adults50.4%42.9–58.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.1%7.3–16.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6411.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)5.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)62.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)15.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle5.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription98.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate67.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population4.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households30.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+7.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age20.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$67,019$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$145,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.9 yr ± 0.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.93 years of 73.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured