Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45331

in Greenville, OhioPopulation 22,356

42.58/ 100

Ranked #24,745 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #868 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

51.7%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.4 pCi/L

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

300 units

in the top 8.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

9.9%

in the top 10.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US84th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

41.7%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US73rd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

9.4%

in the top 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US74th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

33.4%

in the bottom 31% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US31st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By the composite health measure, Greenville, Ohio (ZIP 45331) ranks in the bottom 23% nationally (24,745th) and the bottom 26% of Ohio (868th).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: modeled arsenic is in the top 0.6% nationally, and radon settles in the top 5.9% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease resides in the top 10.5% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility registers at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 16% nationally. More encouragingly, distance to an emergency room stands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing lies in the top 8.2% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home sits at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Elder services is in the top 17% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Close by, ZIP 45303, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 47%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Lifting this score

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.1%32.3–39.8
High blood pressure among adults43.0%38.5–47.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.9%9.9–12.0
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.0–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults9.9%8.9–10.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.6%10.4–12.8
Depression among adults26.8%22.9–30.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.2%14.1–18.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.7%37.0–46.2
Obesity among adults37.6%29.8–45.6
Stroke among adults4.8%4.4–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.6%15.6–22.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.9%7.6–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.4%79.9–84.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%77.5–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%84.0–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.5%57.7–67.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.5%56.2–63.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.5%65.0–79.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.0–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.3%16.8–21.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.9%27.8–37.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.4%27.9–39.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.3%21.4–27.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.4–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%15.2–19.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.4–18.0
Any disability among adults36.0%31.4–40.5
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.4–10.5
Independent living disability among adults10.4%9.3–11.5
Mobility disability among adults18.4%16.1–20.7
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.6–5.5
Vision disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%17.8–24.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.8%13.4–18.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.7%12.6–16.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.6–13.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.4–9.6
Loneliness among adults34.3%28.8–40.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.5–10.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6412.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)10.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle7.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription86.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate64.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households51.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+22.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age43.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$53,801$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$166,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$767$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.2 yr ± 0.5978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.59 years of 77.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured