Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45236

in Cincinnati, OhioPopulation 24,513

58.22/ 100

Ranked #6,216 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #106 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 9.1%)

Ranked #29 of 156 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Physician access

2.6 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

1.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.12%

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.2 mi

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

91.3%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

11.0%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.4%

in the bottom 13.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 45236, one of several in Cincinnati, Ohio, overall, ranks in the top 19% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,216th) and the top 9.1% of Ohio (106th).

continue reading

This area's most favorable readings come through plainly in the numbers: physicians settles in the top 4.4% nationally, and transit is in the top 5.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Fatal road crashes lands in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and floodplain exposure lies in the bottom 7.7% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability stands in the bottom 10.2% nationally, and civic rests in the top 12.8% nationally. On the other side, modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 4.8% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site resides in the bottom 8.0% nationally. PFOS in drinking water settles in the top 8.4% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. ZIP 45241, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 83%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 87%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.6 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $84,037 predicts 79.4 years — 1.8 years below.

    Ranked #2,288 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 6.8 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 71.1 — 64 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,838 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.9%25.5–30.4
High blood pressure among adults34.6%31.7–37.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.1%8.3–10.0
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Depression among adults24.5%21.8–27.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.5–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.3%32.3–38.3
Obesity among adults31.7%27.8–35.7
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.3%8.5–12.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%5.1–7.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.2%77.9–82.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%77.5–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults88.3%86.8–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%67.0–74.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.7%64.9–70.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.4%74.2–84.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.5%15.1–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.3%9.9–12.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.0%18.4–23.8
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%32.0–39.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.1%13.4–16.9
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.7–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.0%9.8–12.2
Any disability among adults24.2%21.6–27.0
Hearing disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.8
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Mobility disability among adults11.1%9.8–12.5
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.4%16.6–22.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.4–11.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.5–8.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.4–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Loneliness among adults31.2%27.1–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–646.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)4.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)51.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)3.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription91.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate60.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population8.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households52.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+21.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age39.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$84,037$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$231,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,305$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.6 yr ± 0.5078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.50 years of 77.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured