Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45230

in Cincinnati, OhioPopulation 27,501

60.01/ 100

Ranked #4,867 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranked #79 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 6.8%)

Ranked #20 of 156 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN ZIPs (top 12.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOS in drinking water

96.7%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.7%

in the bottom 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.9%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Park land

10.5%

in the top 11.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

10.2%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

14.3%

in the bottom 10.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.1%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.1%

in the top 10.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, ZIP 45230, one of several in Cincinnati, Ohio stands in the top 15% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,867th) and the top 6.8% of Ohio (79th).

continue reading

The strongest marks in the data are worth naming first: transit is in the top 7.4% nationally, and modeled food insecurity registers in the bottom 11.0% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lies in the bottom 11.1% nationally. Distance to a community health center is at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled cognitive disability registers in the bottom 9.5% nationally, park land lies in the top 11.5% nationally, and modeled mobility disability is in the bottom 9.9% nationally. Modeled transportation registers in the bottom 12.4% nationally. On the other side, PFOS in drinking water lies in the top 5.8% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the top 8.5% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. ZIP 45226, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 95%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 79.2 ± 1.4 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.7 years — 2.5 years above them.

    Ranked #1,168 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.7%25.3–30.2
High blood pressure among adults33.1%30.3–36.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.4–10.1
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.7–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.4–6.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Depression among adults26.2%23.4–29.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.9%9.6–12.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.1%32.1–38.1
Obesity among adults32.0%28.2–36.0
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.5%7.0–10.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.6–6.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.5–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%77.1–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.3%86.9–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.2%67.7–74.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.9%68.3–73.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.1%75.0–84.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.6%16.1–21.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.4%9.9–13.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.3%16.9–22.1
Short sleep duration among adults33.9%30.3–37.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.3%12.7–16.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.7%14.1–17.4
Frequent physical distress among adults10.9%9.7–12.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
Any disability among adults23.1%20.6–25.9
Hearing disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.7
Independent living disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.8
Mobility disability among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.0
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.8%15.2–20.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.3–10.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.8–8.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.7–9.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.7–6.2
Loneliness among adults30.2%26.1–34.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.1–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–645.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)3.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)54.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle6.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription94.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate74.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population3.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households45.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+16.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age37.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$89,516$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$262,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,053$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 0.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.72 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured