ZIP code
44670
in Robertsville, OhioPopulation 229
54.55/ 100
Ranked #10,001 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 31%)
Ranked #199 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 17%)
Ranked #6 of 40 Canton-Massillon, OH ZIPs (top 15.0%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS2ndDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
52.6%
in the bottom 1.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Walkability
180 intersections/sq mi
in the top 3.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST95thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Transportation noise
14.2%
in the top 4.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.
Full methodology ›Loud transportation noise
1.8%
in the top 8.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS91stDefinition & source ›
The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
18.9%
in the top 11.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS88thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
10.2%
in the bottom 18% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST5thUS18thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›The read
In its overall standing, Robertsville, Ohio (ZIP 44670) lands in the top 31% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,001st) and the top 17% of Ohio (199th).
This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: modeled expected annual loss is in the bottom 1.7% nationally, housing-cost burden sits at the national minimum, and homeownership lands at the national maximum. Walkability lies in the top 3.6% nationally. Unemployment stands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Set against that, home broadband subscription rests in the bottom 1.8% nationally, and modeled transportation noise registers in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise resides in the top 8.9% nationally. Fiber broadband settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking is in the top 11.9% nationally.
Against the wider neighborhood, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. On the overall standing, ZIP 44721, about 8.7 miles away, ranks healthier.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Canton-Massillon, OH metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 69%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 63%
16%
Disability
healthier than 81%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 85%
5%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 53%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 46%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 53%
11%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 34%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 25%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 89%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 71%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 83%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 82%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 71%
8%
Disability
healthier than 85%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 89%
5%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 38%
13%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 12%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 97%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 77%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 95%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 85%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 69%
8%
Disability
healthier than 90%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 87%
5%
Holding it back
Preventive Care
healthier than 38%
13%
Healthcare Access
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
44669
Ohioshares a border
Score 53.87
Closest healthier
44721
Ohioabout 8.7 mi away
Score 55.61
Similar health profile
60520
Illinois98% similar profile
Score 52.15
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 28.3% | 25.3–31.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 32.4% | 28.9–36.0 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.7% | 7.7–9.7 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.0% | 9.7–12.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 5.9% | 5.0–6.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 6.9% | 5.5–8.4 |
| Depression among adults | 25.0% | 21.8–28.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 10.2% | 8.7–11.9 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 35.6% | 32.1–39.2 |
| Obesity among adults | 36.6% | 31.2–42.1 |
| Stroke among adults | 3.0% | 2.5–3.5 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 12.6% | 10.4–15.1 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 6.7% | 5.0–8.9 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 77.0% | 74.0–79.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 76.9% | 73.4–80.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 85.4% | 82.9–87.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 64.2% | 60.0–68.2 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 71.3% | 68.4–74.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 72.0% | 65.0–78.4 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 18.9% | 16.0–22.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 14.6% | 11.2–18.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 23.9% | 19.5–28.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 32.7% | 28.6–37.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 16.4% | 13.5–19.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.3% | 15.0–19.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 12.7% | 10.8–14.9 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 13.3% | 11.2–15.9 |
| Any disability among adults | 27.5% | 23.5–32.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 6.1% | 5.3–7.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.1% | 5.9–8.4 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 11.6% | 9.5–14.1 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.9% | 2.4–3.5 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.8% | 3.1–4.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 20.5% | 17.0–24.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.5% | 7.3–12.1 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 7.1% | 5.2–9.3 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 8.3% | 6.6–10.4 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 6.1% | 5.0–7.3 |
| Loneliness among adults | 35.3% | 30.3–40.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 5.8% | 4.7–7.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OH median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 4.4% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 8.6% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 19.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171 |
| Households without a vehicle | 10.5% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177 |
| Broadband subscription | 52.6% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180 |
| Single-parent households | 63.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 53.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168 |
| Population 65+ | 38.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180 |
| Median age | 45.6 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169 |
| Median household income | $82,917 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127 |
| Median home value | $106,800 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OH median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 76.4 yr ± 1.61 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.61 years of 76.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured