Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

44440

in Mineral Ridge, OhioPopulation 4,418

45.71/ 100

Ranked #21,644 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #691 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #23 of 50 Youngstown-Warren, OH ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

71.6%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

20.9%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

92.4%

in the top 13.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

Mineral Ridge, Ohio (ZIP 44440), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 33% nationally (21,644th) and the bottom 41% of Ohio (691st).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: fiber broadband is in the top 13.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lies at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk registers in the bottom 14.3% nationally, and fatal road crashes is in the bottom 18% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled pfas lies in the top 4.0% nationally, and arsenic registers in the top 6.0% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 17% nationally. Recreation registers at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. PFOS in drinking water is in the top 18% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 44437, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Youngstown-Warren, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.6%32.7–38.2
High blood pressure among adults39.8%36.4–42.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.6–11.3
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.9–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%8.7–10.8
Depression among adults25.4%22.4–28.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.7%13.1–16.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%36.3–42.5
Obesity among adults38.3%33.3–42.8
Stroke among adults4.3%3.9–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.8%14.3–19.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.0%6.9–9.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.1%79.9–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%77.9–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%85.3–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.3%62.7–69.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.9%57.1–62.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.7%68.0–79.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%13.0–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.5%15.4–19.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.5%25.9–32.8
Short sleep duration among adults39.1%35.1–43.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.5%18.2–22.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%16.0–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.3%13.7–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.8–15.7
Any disability among adults31.5%28.3–34.7
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.2
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.9–9.7
Mobility disability among adults15.9%14.1–17.6
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.8–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%18.3–24.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.6–15.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.9–13.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.9–11.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.4–8.2
Loneliness among adults32.6%28.6–36.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.6–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)7.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)3.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle3.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription88.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate77.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households62.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+27.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age46.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$64,904$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$167,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$819$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.3 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 75.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured