Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

44402

in Bristolville, OhioPopulation 2,613

40.89/ 100

Ranked #26,119 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #937 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #34 of 50 Youngstown-Warren, OH ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.34 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.34 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.5 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

22.9%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

9.6%

in the top 13.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

0.1 days/year

in the bottom 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Bristolville, Ohio (ZIP 44402) comes out in the bottom 19% nationally (26,119th) and the bottom 20% of Ohio (937th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: grocery rests in the top 3.1% nationally, elder services lies in the top 3.9% nationally, and recreation sits in the top 8.6% nationally. Modeled disaster risk settles in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise registers at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Crowded housing stands at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Set against that, walkability lands in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and modeled arsenic is in the top 5.2% nationally. Fiber broadband resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas rests in the top 12.6% nationally.

In plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 44410, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Youngstown-Warren, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.1%32.8–39.2
High blood pressure among adults40.4%36.5–43.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%8.9–10.8
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.6%8.4–10.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.8%10.1–13.7
Depression among adults27.1%23.6–30.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.9%13.8–18.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.2%36.3–43.7
Obesity among adults39.9%34.0–45.4
Stroke among adults4.7%4.1–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.4%14.6–20.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.0%7.6–12.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.1%78.4–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%75.9–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults84.3%82.1–86.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.3%59.7–68.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.3%53.0–59.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.9%63.9–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.5–17.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.3%18.0–24.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.1%28.3–38.0
Short sleep duration among adults39.4%34.6–44.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.3%20.9–28.0
Frequent mental distress among adults19.6%17.4–22.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.3%15.1–19.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.0%14.8–19.4
Any disability among adults35.1%30.8–39.5
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
Independent living disability among adults10.6%9.2–12.2
Mobility disability among adults18.1%15.5–20.9
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.5–6.1
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.5–7.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%18.7–26.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.8%14.2–21.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.1%12.8–19.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.6%10.3–14.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.6–10.6
Loneliness among adults34.0%28.7–38.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.7–10.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6419.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)20.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)3.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription95.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate88.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households54.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+16.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age49.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$75,539$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$177,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$645$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 0.9178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.91 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured