Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

43066

in Radnor, OhioPopulation 1,368

61.47/ 100

Ranked #3,833 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.0%)

Ranked #59 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 5.1%)

Ranked #19 of 127 Columbus, OH ZIPs (top 15.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.79 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.3 pCi/L

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.5 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.7%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.8%

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

1.5%

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$129,012

in the top 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.8%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Radnor, Ohio (ZIP 43066) ranks in the top 12.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,833rd) and the top 5.1% of Ohio (59th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: childcare lands in the top 3.9% nationally, and modeled transportation sits in the bottom 5.1% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity is in the bottom 6.0% nationally, and poverty settles in the bottom 6.0% nationally. Household income resides in the top 7.2% nationally, and modeled food insecurity registers in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Set against that, PFOA in drinking water rests at the national maximum, modeled radon stands in the top 6.5% nationally, and walkability lies in the bottom 4.6% nationally. PFAS in drinking water lands at the national maximum.

To spell things out, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Close by, ZIP 43061, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Columbus, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 99%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.5%29.6–35.6
High blood pressure among adults37.0%33.7–40.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%10.0–12.1
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.1–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%5.9–8.1
Depression among adults21.9%19.1–24.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%10.7–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%35.0–41.5
Obesity among adults34.0%29.5–38.8
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.9%7.3–10.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%4.1–6.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.2%79.7–84.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.9%80.4–85.4
Cholesterol screening among adults90.1%88.6–91.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.6%69.0–76.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults75.0%72.4–77.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%74.0–84.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.6%15.2–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.5%10.1–15.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.3%16.9–24.0
Short sleep duration among adults30.4%26.8–34.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.4%12.2–16.8
Frequent mental distress among adults13.9%12.2–15.7
Frequent physical distress among adults12.0%10.4–13.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.4%9.0–11.9
Any disability among adults23.5%20.2–26.9
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Independent living disability among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Mobility disability among adults11.5%9.8–13.5
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.6–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.2%14.4–20.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.2–9.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.6–7.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.6–8.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.0–5.5
Loneliness among adults29.8%25.4–34.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.2–6.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate1.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–644.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)46.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription87.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate91.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households52.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+27.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age46.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$129,012$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$389,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.4 yr ± 1.2478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.24 years of 79.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured