Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

42634

in Parkers Lake, KentuckyPopulation 1,646

17.48/ 100

Ranked #31,971 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 0.3%)

Ranked #699 of 742 Kentucky ZIPs (bottom 5.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Some domains have limited local data — read this Score as directional

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

35.6%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

92.1%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Park land

74.9%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

45.4%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.7%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST12th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

68.1%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

31.6%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

6.5%

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$31,250

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

With the picture still incomplete, Parkers Lake, Kentucky (ZIP 42634) lands in the bottom 0.3% nationally (31,971st) and the bottom 5.8% of Kentucky (699th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

From the measures on hand, the profile can say a few things: modeled tree cover rests in the top 0.8% nationally, park land sits in the top 0.9% nationally, and fiber broadband registers in the top 4.8% nationally. Housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 6.0% nationally. Against that, modeled tooth loss resides in the top 1.1% nationally, and short sleep lies in the top 2.6% nationally. Modeled mammography settles in the bottom 5.0% nationally, and home broadband subscription stands in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Poverty is in the top 6.0% nationally, and household income rests in the bottom 2.2% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 40701, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

6%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

19%

Preventive CarePartial

healthier than 3%

15%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

6%

Not placed: Chronic Disease Burden and Risk Behavior — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 38% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

No data: Mental Health and Disability — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

6%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

19%

Preventive CarePartial

in the bottom 0.00%

15%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

6%

Not placed: Chronic Disease Burden and Risk Behavior — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 38% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

No data: Mental Health and Disability — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years35.6%30.6–40.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.0%53.1–64.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults40.8%36.9–44.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.7%57.5–75.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Short sleep duration among adults45.4%38.2–52.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate31.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.1% (4.6–39.2%) n=747
Uninsured 18–645.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.9% (0.0–16.5%) n=741
No HS diploma (25+)17.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.7% (3.8–29.1%) n=748
Bachelor's or higher (25+)7.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.8% (1.5–33.6%) n=748
Unemployment rate (16+)7.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–11.2%) n=733
Households without a vehicle7.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.0–15.0%) n=745
Broadband subscription68.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (71.5–97.1%) n=745
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)6.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.9% (6.2–34.7%) n=745
Homeownership rate85.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (58.2–96.7%) n=745
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.8%) n=745
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.3% (0.0–5.4%) n=749
Single-parent households44.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.0% (34.7–75.0%) n=738
Population 65+17.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (9.6–29.6%) n=749
Median age40.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (32.3–53.9) n=738
Median household income$31,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$57,097 ($34,611–$87,693) n=645
Median home value$68,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$144,600 ($66,860–$265,120) n=643
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$821 ($592–$1,170) n=466
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth68.6 yr ± 1.9878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.8 yr (71.5–78.1) n=739

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.98 years of 68.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured