Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

41616

in David, KentuckyPopulation 544

31.72/ 100

Ranked #30,379 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 5.3%)

Ranked #430 of 742 Kentucky ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Some domains have limited local data — read this Score as directional

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

86.9%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.4%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

30.7%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

71.2%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

15.2%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

41.6%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

55 mi

in the top 10.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Working from the partial data available, David, Kentucky (ZIP 41616) lands in the bottom 5.3% nationally (30,379th) and the bottom 42% of Kentucky (430th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

A few available readings carry what can be said: modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the bottom 0.8% nationally, and tree cover rests in the top 2.4% nationally. Unemployment settles at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site lands in the top 10.2% nationally. Working the other way, modeled short sleep rests in the top 3.9% nationally, and poverty settles in the top 6.5% nationally. Home broadband subscription lands in the bottom 6.8% nationally, and households without a vehicle rests in the top 7.2% nationally. Housing-cost burden settles in the top 8.4% nationally. Fiber broadband lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Defined simply, for reference, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 41645, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

6%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

6%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

19%

Preventive CarePartial

healthier than 9%

15%

Not placed: Chronic Disease Burden and Risk Behavior — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 38% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

No data: Mental Health and Disability — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

6%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

19%

Preventive CarePartial

in the bottom 0.00%

15%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

6%

Not placed: Chronic Disease Burden and Risk Behavior — too little of each is measured here to compare reliably. They still count toward the score (together 38% of it); we just will not publish a standing we cannot stand behind.

No data: Mental Health and Disability — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.5%18.8–26.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.1%53.4–64.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.4%48.5–56.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.4%63.0–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Short sleep duration among adults44.4%37.7–51.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate30.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.1% (4.6–39.2%) n=747
Uninsured 18–641.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.9% (0.0–16.5%) n=741
No HS diploma (25+)10.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.7% (3.8–29.1%) n=748
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.8% (1.5–33.6%) n=748
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.8% (0.0–11.2%) n=733
Households without a vehicle15.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.6% (0.0–15.0%) n=745
Broadband subscription71.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (71.5–97.1%) n=745
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)41.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.9% (6.2–34.7%) n=745
Homeownership rate84.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.0% (58.2–96.7%) n=745
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.8%) n=745
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.3% (0.0–5.4%) n=749
Single-parent households36.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.0% (34.7–75.0%) n=738
Population 65+2.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (9.6–29.6%) n=749
Median age41.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (32.3–53.9) n=738
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$57,097 ($34,611–$87,693) n=645
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$144,600 ($66,860–$265,120) n=643
Median gross rent$933$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$821 ($592–$1,170) n=466
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.5 yr ± 1.2978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.8 yr (71.5–78.1) n=739

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.29 years of 72.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured