Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39641

in Jayess, MississippiPopulation 6,769

38.05/ 100

Ranked #27,976 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.8%)

Ranked #257 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

28.4%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

9.8 µg/L

in the bottom 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.4%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST53rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

144.6 days/year

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.05%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.4%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.3%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST53rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.3%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST58th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

69.2%

in the bottom 11.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST35th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Jayess, Mississippi (ZIP 39641) ranks in the bottom 12.8% nationally (27,976th) and the bottom 37% of Mississippi (257th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: lithium in drinking water stands in the bottom 5.4% nationally, and modeled transportation noise lies in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. On the other side, modeled tooth loss sits in the top 4.2% nationally, high blood pressure is in the top 5.4% nationally, and humid heat settles in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled mobility disability resides in the top 8.4% nationally, self-care disability registers in the top 9.7% nationally, and cognitive disability rests in the top 11.1% nationally. Modeled stroke stands in the top 10.1% nationally.

To spell things out, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Close by, ZIP 39643, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.5 ± 2.1 years. A median household income of $65,010 predicts 78.4 years — 4.8 years below.

    Ranked #5,491 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 93.6 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 10.0 (bottom 10%) — 84 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #337 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.5%31.8–37.2
High blood pressure among adults48.4%45.1–51.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.1–9.5
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.2–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.4–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
Depression among adults21.2%18.7–23.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.2%15.5–19.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.0%38.8–45.4
Obesity among adults43.3%37.7–49.3
Stroke among adults5.3%4.8–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years28.4%25.1–31.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.7%10.7–14.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.1%79.2–83.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%78.6–83.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.8–87.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.8%57.1–64.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults7.3%6.4–8.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.2%62.9–74.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.4%11.7–15.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.4%19.0–24.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.9%33.9–42.2
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%32.6–41.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.4%25.6–31.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.5–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults17.6%16.0–19.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.6%17.6–21.7
Any disability among adults42.5%38.8–46.4
Hearing disability among adults10.0%9.1–11.1
Independent living disability among adults11.9%10.7–13.2
Mobility disability among adults22.4%20.1–24.7
Self-care disability among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Vision disability among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.7%25.8–31.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.5%21.0–26.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.7–16.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.2%14.5–18.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.9%10.8–13.2
Loneliness among adults36.5%32.9–40.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6425.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)15.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)9.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle1.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription82.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate82.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population0.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households49.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+14.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age36.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$65,010$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$119,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$937$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.5 yr ± 1.0878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.08 years of 73.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured