Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39501

in Gulfport, MississippiPopulation 22,565

28.49/ 100

Ranked #31,035 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.3%)

Ranked #365 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (bottom 10.1%)

Ranked #26 of 26 Gulfport-Biloxi, MS ZIPs (bottom 3.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

8.9%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

11.7%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

32.1%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

15.3%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

47%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

23.3%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

34.6%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

1,011 units

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

25.5%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

20.5%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 39501, one of several in Gulfport, Mississippi ranks in the bottom 3.3% nationally (31,035th) and the bottom 10.1% of Mississippi (365th).

continue reading

Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled self-care disability registers in the top 1.5% nationally, and vision disability sits in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled tooth loss rests in the top 2.1% nationally, and independent living disability is in the top 2.3% nationally. Modeled short sleep stands in the top 1.4% nationally, cognitive disability settles in the top 2.1% nationally, and fair or poor health lies in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled mobility disability resides in the top 2.9% nationally, and transportation lands in the top 2.0% nationally. On the encouraging side, subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 1.4% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 39503, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Gulfport-Biloxi, MS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 69.2 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $34,758 predicts 75.9 years — 6.7 years below.

    Ranked #5,788 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 69.2 ± 1.2 years. The 46 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.4 years — 6.2 years below them.

    Ranked #3,566 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 74.1; chronic-disease standing 8.4 (bottom 10%) — 66 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,341 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.4%27.3–33.3
High blood pressure among adults49.3%45.5–52.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.1%5.5–6.6
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%8.0–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.6%10.4–12.8
Depression among adults21.2%18.2–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults20.0%17.8–22.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%35.3–42.9
Obesity among adults44.8%38.8–50.5
Stroke among adults6.1%5.7–6.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years32.1%27.7–36.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.8%14.6–19.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.5–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%78.7–84.5
Cholesterol screening among adults82.5%80.3–84.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years55.2%50.1–60.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults6.1%5.1–7.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.2%60.4–75.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.7%9.6–13.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.8%21.1–26.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults46.7%42.0–51.2
Short sleep duration among adults47.0%41.7–52.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults34.6%31.4–37.8
Frequent mental distress among adults21.0%18.7–23.2
Frequent physical distress among adults18.5%16.5–20.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.3%21.0–25.5
Any disability among adults47.6%43.3–51.7
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.6–9.5
Independent living disability among adults15.3%13.9–16.7
Mobility disability among adults25.5%23.0–27.9
Self-care disability among adults8.9%8.2–9.6
Vision disability among adults11.7%10.8–12.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults34.3%30.5–38.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults39.1%35.9–42.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults30.0%27.1–32.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.3%24.7–30.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults20.5%18.6–22.5
Loneliness among adults40.0%35.4–44.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults20.4%18.3–22.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate32.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6429.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)20.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)16.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle17.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription77.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)43.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate39.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population2.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households25.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+15.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age38.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$34,758$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$121,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$984$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth69.2 yr ± 0.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 69.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured