Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39218

in Richland, MississippiPopulation 6,873

46.90/ 100

Ranked #20,282 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #81 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #18 of 59 Jackson, MS ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

49.1%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

8.3%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

140.6 days/year

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

39.2 per million

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.41 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.83 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.8 mi

in the bottom 10.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.6%

in the top 10.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.14 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

6.9%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

In overall standing, Richland, Mississippi (ZIP 39218) comes out in the bottom 37% nationally (20,282nd) and the top 20% of Mississippi (81st).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: pharmacy lands in the top 7.6% nationally, dental providers is in the top 10.1% nationally, and elder services resides in the top 11.0% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing rests in the top 12.7% nationally. By contrast, floodplain exposure lies in the top 4.1% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 4.6% nationally. Modeled humid heat settles in the top 7.2% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk registers in the top 7.3% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site stands in the bottom 10.3% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise lands in the top 10.7% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 39201, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Jackson, MS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.1 ± 1.9 years. A median household income of $65,327 predicts 78.4 years — 4.3 years below.

    Ranked #5,221 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 39.2 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 74.1 ± 1.9 years.

    Ranked #1,590 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.1%25.0–31.5
High blood pressure among adults40.8%36.6–45.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Current asthma among adults9.4%8.2–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.5–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.2–8.3
Depression among adults20.3%17.2–23.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%11.0–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.6%34.4–42.9
Obesity among adults38.2%31.5–45.3
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.9%12.1–17.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.6%8.8–12.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%74.4–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.4–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.3%84.3–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.0%55.8–65.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults9.7%8.2–11.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.5%64.4–79.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%12.7–18.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.9%12.5–17.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.9%25.3–34.8
Short sleep duration among adults40.3%34.5–46.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.5%17.7–23.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%14.7–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%11.7–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.4%14.3–18.6
Any disability among adults34.3%29.8–38.8
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.4–8.3
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.7–9.9
Mobility disability among adults15.4%13.3–17.5
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.5
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.8%23.1–30.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.3%14.6–20.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.7–11.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.3–15.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.3–10.8
Loneliness among adults36.0%31.2–41.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.4–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6425.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)12.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)5.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle1.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription88.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate71.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population5.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households37.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+17.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age36.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$65,327$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$128,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$1,185$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.1 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 74.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured