Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39168

in Taylorsville, MississippiPopulation 6,270

41.25/ 100

Ranked #25,838 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #201 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

61.9%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

49.4%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST60th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

44.4%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.0%

in the bottom 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST38th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

135.3 days/year

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.17 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

17.5%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$45,298

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST38th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Taylorsville, Mississippi (ZIP 39168) ranks in the bottom 19% nationally (25,838th) and the top 50% of Mississippi (201st).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 6.8% nationally, and grocery sits in the top 9.7% nationally. Set against that, home broadband subscription is in the bottom 3.3% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure settles in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 7.8% nationally, obesity registers in the top 5.4% nationally, and humid heat rests in the top 8.5% nationally. Modeled tooth loss stands in the top 10.2% nationally, diabetes lies in the top 9.8% nationally, and transportation lands in the top 10.6% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Close by, ZIP 39116, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 79.1 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $45,298 predicts 77.0 years — 2.1 years above.

    Ranked #859 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 79.1 ± 1.7 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.5 years — 3.6 years above them.

    Ranked #529 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 78.8; chronic-disease standing 14.8 — 64 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,453 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.5%29.8–35.2
High blood pressure among adults49.4%46.1–52.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.8%7.2–8.4
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.5–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.6–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.8–10.8
Depression among adults19.1%16.7–21.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.5%15.8–19.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.5%37.1–43.9
Obesity among adults44.4%38.7–50.1
Stroke among adults5.2%4.9–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.1%20.1–26.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.9%10.4–13.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.4%79.6–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.5%80.0–84.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.9%85.4–88.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.8%58.8–66.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults8.2%7.2–9.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.0%68.0–79.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.0%10.2–13.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.8%16.8–21.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.3%33.6–41.2
Short sleep duration among adults39.6%34.9–44.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.0%24.6–29.5
Frequent mental distress among adults17.5%15.9–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults16.0%14.6–17.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.5%16.8–20.3
Any disability among adults40.6%37.2–44.1
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.7–9.3
Independent living disability among adults11.5%10.5–12.6
Mobility disability among adults21.5%19.6–23.5
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.7–6.7
Vision disability among adults7.9%7.3–8.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.8%27.8–34.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.2%22.8–27.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.5%13.7–17.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.7%16.8–20.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.9%11.7–14.1
Loneliness among adults37.3%33.4–41.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.4%11.1–13.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6417.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)19.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle1.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription61.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate85.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households54.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+19.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age43.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$45,298$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$89,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$727$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured