Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38647

in Michigan City, MississippiPopulation 994

40.45/ 100

Ranked #26,442 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #221 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranked #48 of 81 Memphis, TN-MS-AR ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High blood pressure

50.1%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.8%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

45.2%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.2%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.7%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

38.8%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.6%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

21.8%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.6%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST58th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

14.6%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Distance to the nearest emergency room
  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

By its overall health score, Michigan City, Mississippi (ZIP 38647) lands in the bottom 18% nationally (26,442nd) and the bottom 46% of Mississippi (221st).

continue reading

The measures that define the ground here come first: modeled high blood pressure lies in the top 3.4% nationally, and diabetes resides in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled obesity lands in the top 4.1% nationally, and loud transportation noise registers in the top 6.4% nationally. Modeled tooth loss sits in the top 7.7% nationally, loneliness rests in the top 6.5% nationally, and stroke is in the top 6.9% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity stands in the top 6.8% nationally, self-care disability settles in the top 7.9% nationally, and transportation lies in the top 6.9% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 38603, just across the boundary. On a broader view, the area also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Memphis, TN-MS-AR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 47%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.9%28.4–35.6
High blood pressure among adults50.1%45.9–54.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.4%5.8–7.2
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.8–10.3
Depression among adults17.5%14.7–20.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.8%16.5–21.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.1%34.7–43.8
Obesity among adults45.2%36.9–54.2
Stroke among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.7%20.5–29.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.1%10.8–15.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%78.9–83.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.1%79.9–85.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.9%84.9–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.9%58.5–69.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults8.6%7.2–10.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.5%64.0–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.0%9.7–14.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.5%15.7–21.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.0%32.7–43.5
Short sleep duration among adults41.5%34.1–49.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.5%24.9–32.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.7%15.6–19.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%13.9–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.8%16.5–21.4
Any disability among adults41.8%36.9–47.0
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.5–8.3
Independent living disability among adults11.8%10.3–13.3
Mobility disability among adults22.5%19.7–25.4
Self-care disability among adults6.6%5.8–7.4
Vision disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults34.3%29.5–39.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.4%24.0–32.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.9%14.6–21.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.8%18.5–25.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.6–16.8
Loneliness among adults38.8%32.9–44.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.2–16.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)17.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle5.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription72.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate80.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population5.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households78.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+17.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age49.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$62,820$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$94,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.4 yr ± 0.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.89 years of 72.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured