Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38611

in Byhalia, MississippiPopulation 16,537

37.90/ 100

Ranked #28,068 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.5%)

Ranked #261 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #56 of 81 Memphis, TN-MS-AR ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

55.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.0%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.7%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.3%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.5%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST61st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.0%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.6%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.5%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.4%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

Byhalia, Mississippi (ZIP 38611), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 12.5% nationally (28,068th) and the bottom 36% of Mississippi (261st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: fatal road crashes stands in the top 2.9% nationally. Working the other way, modeled self-care disability is in the top 5.9% nationally, high blood pressure rests in the top 4.9% nationally, and mobility disability sits in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled diabetes registers in the top 6.8% nationally, and vision disability lands in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled stroke resides in the top 6.9% nationally, and fair or poor health lies in the top 9.3% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss settles in the top 8.4% nationally, and independent living disability stands in the top 9.3% nationally.

In everyday language, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 38066, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Memphis, TN-MS-AR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.8 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $58,830 predicts 78.0 years — 3.2 years below.

    Ranked #4,377 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.5%31.2–37.8
High blood pressure among adults48.7%44.7–52.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.6–9.1
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.4%8.5–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.3%10.1–12.5
Depression among adults20.4%17.5–23.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.5%16.4–20.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.2%38.1–46.3
Obesity among adults40.7%33.8–47.8
Stroke among adults5.6%5.2–6.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.4%19.7–27.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.9%12.2–15.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.2%79.9–84.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.6%78.6–84.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.9%84.2–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.3%56.4–66.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults8.3%7.1–9.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.0%63.1–78.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.6%10.5–14.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.9%18.5–23.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults37.7%33.1–42.4
Short sleep duration among adults38.9%33.1–45.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.5%26.6–32.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.1%16.2–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults17.7%15.9–19.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.6%17.7–21.6
Any disability among adults43.4%39.2–47.7
Hearing disability among adults10.0%8.9–11.0
Independent living disability among adults12.4%11.3–13.6
Mobility disability among adults23.3%20.9–25.7
Self-care disability among adults7.0%6.4–7.5
Vision disability among adults9.0%8.2–9.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.6%26.0–33.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.2%23.4–29.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.0%14.8–19.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.5%16.3–20.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.4%12.0–14.9
Loneliness among adults37.4%32.7–42.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.5%11.0–14.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6421.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)20.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription82.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate78.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population4.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households46.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+17.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age38.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$58,830$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$201,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$1,082$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.8 yr ± 0.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.74 years of 74.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured