Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38368

in Reagan, TennesseePopulation 2,635

40.17/ 100

Ranked #26,640 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #330 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lithium in drinking water

67 µg/L

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.51 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

13.8%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Reagan, Tennessee (ZIP 38368), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 17% nationally (26,640th) and the bottom 46% of Tennessee (330th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: childcare stands in the top 10.3% nationally. Crowded housing lands at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Set against that, lithium in drinking water is in the top 6.9% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol resides in the top 10.2% nationally. Home broadband subscription rests in the bottom 14.0% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability lies in the top 15% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure sits in the top 14.6% nationally, and humid heat settles in the top 17% nationally. Modeled mobility disability registers in the top 17% nationally. Recreation stands at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

Defined in plain terms, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 38345, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 88.7; chronic-disease standing 14.4 — 74 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #805 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.0%33.8–40.1
High blood pressure among adults44.3%40.6–48.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.2–11.0
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%8.1–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.6%10.1–13.2
Depression among adults29.3%25.8–32.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.8%14.0–17.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.1%39.3–47.1
Obesity among adults39.0%32.7–45.7
Stroke among adults4.5%4.1–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.2%15.5–21.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.8%9.7–14.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.7–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.9%75.8–81.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.4–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.9%57.3–66.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.2%50.7–57.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%64.7–77.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.3–16.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.7%18.6–24.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.6%26.2–35.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.0%32.5–43.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.3%23.0–29.6
Frequent mental distress among adults19.8%17.8–21.7
Frequent physical distress among adults17.9%16.0–19.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.8%16.6–21.0
Any disability among adults40.2%35.9–44.3
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.8–10.9
Independent living disability among adults10.9%9.7–12.3
Mobility disability among adults20.1%17.7–22.6
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.4–5.6
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–648.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)5.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)1.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle4.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription78.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate84.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households52.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+19.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age37.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$65,441$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$202,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$609$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.0 yr ± 0.7878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.78 years of 75.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured