Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38363

in Parsons, TennesseePopulation 5,808

33.10/ 100

Ranked #30,018 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.4%)

Ranked #542 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (bottom 12.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Pharmacy access

0.55 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.92 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.3%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.9%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.6%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.7%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.4%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.18 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.1%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Parsons, Tennessee (ZIP 38363) sits in the bottom 6.4% nationally (30,018th) and the bottom 12.1% of Tennessee (542nd).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: pharmacy is in the top 4.1% nationally, civic rests in the top 4.8% nationally, and elder services sits in the top 7.8% nationally. Grocery registers in the top 8.4% nationally. On the other hand, modeled mobility disability lands in the top 6.2% nationally, and independent living disability resides in the top 7.1% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability lies in the top 7.2% nationally, and fair or poor health settles in the top 8.9% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease stands in the top 7.1% nationally, and hearing disability is in the top 8.7% nationally.

ZIP 37096, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall. Modeled independent living disability is in the top 7.1% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.5 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $43,704 predicts 76.8 years — 2.4 years below.

    Ranked #3,219 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 63.2; chronic-disease standing 5.2 (bottom 10%) — 58 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,885 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.6%34.9–42.4
High blood pressure among adults46.3%41.9–50.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.4–11.4
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.1–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults10.4%9.4–11.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.8%12.4–15.4
Depression among adults30.5%26.4–34.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.7%15.5–20.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.7%39.1–48.4
Obesity among adults42.6%34.5–51.0
Stroke among adults5.3%4.9–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.0%19.1–27.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.1%12.0–16.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%77.0–82.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%75.8–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.5–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.6%57.2–67.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.8%48.9–56.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.6%61.9–78.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.7%10.3–15.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.7%20.7–26.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.4%28.6–38.6
Short sleep duration among adults40.9%33.9–48.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.7%26.3–33.0
Frequent mental distress among adults20.6%18.4–23.1
Frequent physical distress among adults19.6%17.4–21.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.6%18.4–22.9
Any disability among adults43.7%38.9–48.7
Hearing disability among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
Independent living disability among adults12.9%11.5–14.3
Mobility disability among adults23.3%20.7–26.0
Self-care disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.8
Vision disability among adults7.8%7.1–8.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6426.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)20.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)8.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle7.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription78.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate68.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population3.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households50.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+21.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age44.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$43,704$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$120,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$753$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.5 yr ± 0.7978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.79 years of 74.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured