Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38053

in Millington, TennesseePopulation 25,303

40.91/ 100

Ranked #26,104 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #305 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranked #46 of 81 Memphis, TN-MS-AR ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

2.1%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

35.7%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

36.5 per million

in the top 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

1.8%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

23.5 days/year

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US80th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

12 µg/L

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 38053, one of several in Millington, Tennessee, by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 19% nationally (26,104th) and the top 50% of Tennessee (305th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 13.3% nationally. Distance to a nursing home rests at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled expected annual loss lies in the top 2.7% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 4.7% nationally. Slow internet speeds settles in the top 5.6% nationally, and floodplain exposure registers in the top 7.6% nationally. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the top 8.5% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled cognitive disability is in the top 16% nationally, and home broadband subscription resides in the bottom 16% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 38002, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Memphis, TN-MS-AR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.9 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $58,194 predicts 77.9 years — 2.1 years below.

    Ranked #2,730 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.2%28.6–33.9
High blood pressure among adults43.1%40.0–46.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.5%7.8–9.2
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.3–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.1–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Depression among adults27.7%24.7–30.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.8%14.1–17.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.9%37.7–44.1
Obesity among adults38.3%33.9–42.8
Stroke among adults4.4%4.1–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.0%15.2–21.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.1%10.6–13.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.7%75.3–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.0%77.3–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%85.4–88.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.3%61.3–69.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.8%52.7–58.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.6%68.5–80.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.5%12.4–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.3%17.3–21.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.1%24.9–31.4
Short sleep duration among adults38.7%34.8–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.4%22.1–26.8
Frequent mental distress among adults19.7%17.8–21.7
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%14.5–17.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.7%17.0–20.5
Any disability among adults39.0%35.7–42.4
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.5–9.2
Independent living disability among adults10.9%9.9–11.9
Mobility disability among adults19.0%17.2–20.9
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.7–5.5
Vision disability among adults6.7%6.2–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6414.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)9.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription79.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate66.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population3.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households51.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+18.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age39.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$58,194$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$221,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,161$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.9 yr ± 0.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.66 years of 75.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured